GAME WEEK: NOTRE DAME

College football isn’t exactly the land of originality. When you think about it, you have the same storylines playing out each season. Some coaches are on the hot seat, while others are rebuilding. Some teams are lucky, while others are “fighting through adversity.” Some teams get labeled as contenders, while others are labeled as frauds. Last year’s losses become this year’s “revenge.” It’s all quite predictable, actually, which is probably why I find myself gravitating more and more to local coverage of each school rather than reading national newspapers and watching ESPN. More news, less cliche.

Anyway, back to this idea of revenge. I’ve never really understood the concept, at least as far as how it gets applied to college football upsets. Team A beats Team B, so Team B is out for revenge the next year? What, did Team A perpetrate some great injustice by actually trying to win? How dare they! Isn’t winning the whole point of all this hullabaloo? Herm Edwards told me that one time; something about how YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME. Herm is wise man, even if he isn’t the most successful coach in the NFL. So maybe if Navy didn’t just beat Notre Dame last year, but also tore down the goalposts, kicked the leprechaun in the face, and had Bill the Goat eat all the grass in one end zone and poop it out in the other… Maybe then vengeance would be called for. Until then, it’s just a team doing what it’s supposed to do. When an underdog wins, it isn’t revenge that the favorite seeks. It’s redemption. Indeed, tomorrow Notre Dame will be looking to redeem themselves after last year’s upset at the hands of Navy.

Navy fans, of course, are looking for an encore. I knew I would see the Mids beat Notre Dame eventually, but a year later it’s still a little surreal. Notre Dame week used to be all about the unending talk of the streak and 1963 and the streak and Roger Staubach and the streak. That’s gone now, but I still find myself annoyed. You know the scene in Apollo 13, where TV news crews want to set up equipment on the Lovells’ lawn? Marilyn Lovell’s reaction is basically, “oh, NOW they care.” That’s sort of Notre Dame week in a nutshell. Local TV crews show up to Navy practice, and national newspapers start writing about Navy and their “wishbone” offense and how unusual it is blah blah blah. Now that there’s no streak to talk about, this kind of stuff sticks out more. But hey, that’s one of the reasons why Navy plays Notre Dame; the national coverage it generates– however trite– is good for the program. So I guess I gotta suck it up.

Moving back to things that are predictable, the natural follow-on story the year after a team ends a long losing streak is how the underdog wants to prove that it wasn’t a fluke. Navy fans won’t want to hear it, but in a lot of ways it was a fluke. Think of the perfect storm of things that came together for a Navy win last year. This was the worst Notre Dame team in ages. Their offense had struggled to move the ball all year, and couldn’t decide on which quarterback to start. Their kicker couldn’t make anything longer than an extra point, stopping the Irish on otherwise reasonable chances to score on three drives. While Notre Dame’s defense was respectable, Navy had its best offensive line in decades and a quarterback that graded out at 97%; he literally was almost perfect. But even that wasn’t enough; the Mids had to score a defensive touchdown, too. And even all of that was only good enough to get the game into overtime. Now, this doesn’t mean that Navy was undeserving, or that they weren’t the better team. It’s just that you need to respect everything that went into that win. The result of the game wasn’t a fluke, but the circumstances that made that result possible were clearly out of the ordinary.

The question, then, is how much those circumstances have changed this year, and it appears to be quite a bit. Notre Dame is a better team than they were in 2007. Despite being shut out last week against Boston College, the Irish offense is still gaining 375 yards per game. That’s more than 130 ypg better than their 119th-ranked offense in 2007. A big reason for the improvement is the development of quarterback Jimmy Clausen. The oft-mocked golden boy of Notre Dame’s 2006 recruiting class struggled in his freshman campaign, splitting time with Evan Sharpley (the starter vs. Navy last year). This year, however, he is clearly a more competent player. Clausen threw for 347 yards against Stanford and 383 against then-ranked North Carolina in a close 29-24 loss. Clausen already has four games with 3 or more passing touchdowns, including the 4OT loss to Pitt two weeks ago. Helping his cause are a pair of emerging young wide receivers, Golden Tate and Michael Floyd, who combine for 10 catches and 160 yards per game. Now, does Notre Dame’s schedule have anything to do with their improvement? Absolutely, at least statistically. But you’d be foolish to dismiss their progress as nothing more than favorable scheduling, especially since the Mids haven’t forced Notre Dame to punt since the last election year– even with the terrible Irish offense in 2007.

On the Navy side, all eyes are on the quarterbacks. Senior Jarod Bryant will be getting the start, having sufficiently recovered from the shoulder injury he suffered against SMU. Bryant’s start is not without controversy, as sophomore Ricky Dobbs has directed the Navy offense to victories against SMU and Temple. But no matter who Coach Niumatalolo chose to start, that guy would have some pretty big shoes to fill. Kaipo’s near-perfect game against Notre Dame last year was the key ingredient in Navy’s victory. This year, Navy’s offense will be under even more pressure to keep pace. The coaches believe that Bryant, who Niumat said had a “winning grade” against Pitt and was on his way to a great game against SMU, has the best shot at replicating something close to Kaipo’s performance. No pressure! Then again, quarterback might not be the biggest position change for Navy.

Last year, one of the more celebrated game-planning wrinkles that Paul Johnson incorporated was the use of the tight formation against Notre Dame. It was easy to see the formation, but not everyone understood what exactly the Mids were doing differently out of it. We’ve talked a lot this year about the role of the tackles on triple option plays. On most plays, the tackle tries to run inside of the QB’s give key and block a middle linebacker (Notre Dame lined up with a 5-man front) to keep him from inside-out pursuit. The wide receiver and the A-back block the corner and safety, with each player’s assignment depending on how deep the cornerback lines up. In the tight formation against Notre Dame last year, Paul Johnson changed those blocking assignments:

I apologize if the arrows get confusing, but you can see how different the blocking was. The tackle and the wide receiver basically trade assignments. The wide receiver blocks the linebacker. The tackle releases outside the QB’s read and runs all the way downfield to block the run support safety. The twist in the scheme helped the Mids get to the outside and allowed Reggie Campbell and Shun White combine for 118 yards. Of course, with Jon Tenuta taking over the defense, it’s very possible that Notre Dame will line up differently against Navy this time around. But with the tackles figuring so prominently in Paul Johnson’s game plan last year, one wonders if Ivin Jasper will be able to make similar adjustments given the inconsistency at the position this year. But that’s why they play the game.

It’s weird having the sense that Notre Dame is just a game like any other now. It isn’t, of course; but it’s a lot closer to it with that abominable losing streak no longer hanging over the program. This year the media circus is concentrating less on the streak and more on Charlie Weis assuming playcalling duties. That, and what his fate might be if he loses to Navy again. Hopefully that adds a little pressure to the Domers this year. Because, like always against Notre Dame, Navy can use whatever help it can get.

Advertisements

32 Responses

  1. It is nice to have the pressure to end the streak off of us. I hope Roger Staubach isn’t feeling too neglected this year. The pressure is definitely on ND to win. After reading some of the ND press, I’d be inclined to believe if ND loses, Charlie Weis might be fired before he can even get off the field. That, and his press conferences are extremely long.

  2. What is the makeup of the crowds in Baltimore (still large Irish homefield noise advantage)?
    We will need to get off to a fast start and ND struggle and hope their fans (they will) turn on them and we keep them out of the game.
    If we can get them more interested in chanting Goodbye Charlie we will do well and win.
    I still say..ok well maybe 40 plus passes from ND and we will have to play a physical Wake Forest style game on D.
    But for some reason (maybe 43 years of em) I just cant get that fear out of my head of a beat down by the Irish blobs and their large and fast receivers against us.
    This game will bring us MORE National attention than anything in the last how many years?
    Its as if the whole (college football) world is watching!

    Navy 31
    ND 27

  3. The “dreamer” in me feels another perfect storm coming on. It’s deja vu all over again!

  4. MIke,

    Why did AF whip ND last year, while we had to go to OT?

  5. Each game is a factor of its own individual matchups, circumstances, and planning. There is no such thing as the transitive property in college football.

    That said, at the risk of being a BLOOTER, Air Force had a better defense. Forcing the other team to punt once in a while helps things immensely.

  6. Bingo. That makes sense. Imagine the concept, if you can.

  7. it’ll be interesting to see how tenuta runs his blitz-heavy defense against the TO. i wouldn’t say he’s exactly a guru in playing assignment defense

  8. It’ll be just as interesting to see how JB handles it.

  9. AF in its short history has always performed better against ND than we have.
    Maybe there was no record to keep intact against them like us is what allowed ND to not get as “up” for them as they seemed to against us?

  10. i don’t think ND really had to “get up” much to beat Navy in the past. AF did better because they used to get the best SA recruits and had career options like football coach and PA/NFL

  11. If anyone questions the impact a good coach can make for a team, let them look at Paul Johnson and his record at Navy – and Georgia Southern and now at Georgia Tech. In Alabama they would say of Bear Bryant, “He can take his’n and beat your’n and he can take your’n and beat his’n.” In my opinion, Paul Johnson also fits that description – and Coach N. is on the way.

  12. ?

  13. Lax- Maybe getting up was not the right phrase- maybe fear of being the team to lose the streak?

  14. I’m curious to see if the fact that we finally won one and don’t have the “here we go again” looming over our shoulder changes anything. Probably not, but since most of these kids know it can be done, maybe it makes it easier the second time around.

  15. Without the streak I think it’s just a matter of preparing to play a good football team … if we could do it at Wake then we can do it vs ND.

  16. Gary: On your question re the type of crowd, I’ve been to a lot of Navy/ND games in South Bend, NJ, and Baltimore. From a numbers standpoint, the Baltimore crowd is just as pro-ND as you’ll find in South Bend, but less spirited since there are few ND students. The Balt crowd may be more likely to get quiet if Navy gets out ahead a little bit.

    Mike: While I agree that one can easily call last year a fluke or a “perfect storm,” I see the 43-year streak itself as something as a fluke. Yes, ND is typically much better and far more talented — but wouldn’t you expect Navy to win at least one per decade? Look at it another way: isn’t it a fluke that ND could come out on top in every one of the 8 or so very close games that were played during that period.
    Look, I mean to take nothing away from the Irish — we got beat and out-muscled more often than not. But I’d call it a fluke that we didn’t win a few of the close ones. (’99’s a win in my book, but that’s another story.)

  17. You’d think that the law of averages would’ve worked in Navy’s favor a few times in 4 decades, I guess. But I don’t think Navy was favored in any of those games. What was “supposed” to happen, did.

  18. I would have more confidence with a healthy Kaipo or Ricky Dobbs. ND fired their corners a lot last year but Kaipo made them pay in overtime on the wheel route to Reggie. JB’s passing has been awful this year. He’s consistently missed wide open receivers. I think we have to keep them honest with the passing game and I don’t think JB can do it. I hope I’m wrong.

  19. I don’t know why people get so wrapped up in passing.

  20. Hope you are wrong too-but we have to throw the ball to keep the ND D with 7-8 man fronts off our arses.
    This is the type of game where we all get wrapped up in being able to pass AND CALLING some pass plays-we arent looking for 30 passes here but 15 would be a nice number for us.

  21. Kaipo threw 5 passes in regulation last year. And IJ can CALL pass plays with anyone.

  22. As talked about last year was the “perfect ND storm” and that in part surely enable us to only throw 5 passes.
    We cant count on that again today.
    We WILL not get away with 5 passes again -THAT you can count on.
    Lets just hope Coach N doesnt take the “big gulp” and swallow into conservativeness that as you know allowed ND to escape many times as in the past against us.
    JP could have beat ND maybe 2 more times during his reign if he didnt “play to lose” in those games as he did.

  23. I swear you just make stuff up as you go along.

  24. I swear your rose colored glasses can cloud up the reality you so demand and seek.
    You cant recall 2 games against ND that we had won where PJ ‘tightened and turtled” up playing too conservative at the end and could not close the deal to?
    Come on man.

  25. Well all disagreements aside LOOKS LIKE IRISH EYES ARE SMILING as thundershowers and rain are now in the forecast.
    Sorry but with our offense THAT WILL DOOM US!
    Just friggin great luck and Charlie gets his wish.

  26. Gary, I really don’t think you’re in a position to be calling anyone out on “reality.”

  27. phat, you need to start running the cover it live app for games

    secdef and secstate at the coin flip

  28. 12:44pm is the winner of the office pool on when gomids starts calling for dobbs…like he’s going to be QB and blocking on the outside at the same time

  29. One problem with wordpress is that there’s a lot of stuff like that which isn’t compatible

  30. Fer crying out loud – would someone please tell the CBS announcer our QB’s name is Jarod Bryant, not Jacob Bryant!

  31. 3 forced punts, 2 Ints, and a forced fumble in the 1st half….what a defensive showing for Navy

    too bad our o-line decided to take the first 25 mins of the game off

    hopefully the offense can unscrew itself and keep making blocks in the 2nd half like they did on that scoring drive

    but man oh man, what a wasted opportunity to score big on ND

  32. and that’s why shun doesn’t return kicks

    but at least he made up for it with the first down pick-up

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: