CHANGING COURSE, PART 6: FAQ, CONTINUED

There’s still a lot of ground left to cover, so let’s get to it.

How will Big East membership change NAAA’s financial picture?

Both VADM Miller and Chet Gladchuk have been very clear about their concern for college football’s future and why they feel that Navy needs to join the Big East. There are other implications of Big East membership that haven’t really been addressed, though, with the most notable being how it affects NAAA’s financial outlook. There are a couple of reasons for this, I think. One, until the new TV contract is actually signed, there aren’t any details to talk about. Two, any time you talk about money, it brings out the cynics who believe that athletic departments can instead be funded by platitudes and pep talks. For PR’s sake it probably makes more sense to focus on other things.

In a way, the financial impact of joining the Big East has been addressed, just in different terms. When we talk about remaining in the top tier, we’re really just talking about money. The divide in college football that many fear is around the corner will be based on finances, separating big-money athletic departments from those with smaller budgets for competitive and legislative purposes. If remaining in the top tier of college football is the goal, then NAAA’s financial health must be addressed.

Continue reading “CHANGING COURSE, PART 6: FAQ, CONTINUED”

CHANGING COURSE, PART 5: TELEVISION AND THE TOP TIER

I know I said that I was going to continue the FAQ from part 4, but my answers to some of these questions are so long that it makes more sense for me to make some of them into separate posts. Like this one.

You keep talking about a “top tier.” Let’s say that this haves/have-nots divide does happen in some way. Will the Big East will even be in this top tier?

It’s a fair question. Before it looked like the BCS would do away with AQ status for its conference champions, there was plenty of speculation as to whether the Big East would retain that distinction either way. The conference has struggled to produce high-ranking teams at times, and the 2010 UConn team that went to the Fiesta Bowl wasn’t even ranked in the BCS top 25  (their average position among the six computer rankings used in the BCS formula was 52). Would such a lackluster performance be rewarded with a continued automatic berth in a BCS bowl game?

Now that auto-bids are probably on the way out, we can only speculate how things would have been. Chances are, though, that the Big East would still have been part of the club. Remember, what happens on the field is not the point of the BCS. Television is. And when it comes to TV, the one thing the Big East always had going for it was that it was the conference with the greatest reach into the Northeast. While it isn’t exactly the most football-crazy part of the country, it is the most populated. Even if those TV sets aren’t necessarily tuned in to Big East football every Saturday, it’s still too many people to be ignored. If the BCS bowls have 10 slots to fill, one of them would certainly be reserved for the champion of the Northeast’s conference.

That’s where things get a little hairy for the Big East going forward. (WARNING: TIN FOIL HAT TIME)

Continue reading “CHANGING COURSE, PART 5: TELEVISION AND THE TOP TIER”

A FOOTBALL ON A STRING

If this becomes someone’s million-dollar idea I’m gonna be pissed for not thinking of it first.

Not exactly the most high-profile product endorsement, but it’s cool seeing Eric rockin’ the Navy pro combat. Do the kids still say rockin’? Probably not. Anyway, I’ll probably buy one and put it in my garage next to my Tony Gwynn-endorsed Solohitter.

(Although the best testimonial for the Solohitter is clearly this:

Fred Claire, baseball executive:
“With the salaries major league players are commanding today, SoloHitter is a great investment.”

Helicopter parents, consult your financial advisor before purchasing)

Continue reading “A FOOTBALL ON A STRING”

Bob Socci's avatarBOB SOCCI

By Bob Socci

Originally published in 2012 NCAA Men’s Basketball Championship program.

Several years ago, as a guest of an Annapolis, Md. radio show, former Navy basketball coach Paul Evans cracked a smile and recalled the night he paid a recruiting visit to the Northern Virginia home of Ambrose and Freda Robinson.

The Robinsons’ oldest child, David, was a teenager with an ear for Beethoven and an insatiable intellectual curiosity.  His talents in math and science far exceeded any of the athletic skills yet to emerge during his brief high school career.  He was mainly interested in becoming an engineer.

“What David was most excited about,” Evans chuckled at the memory of their meeting, “was showing me the television set he built.”

“I was a bit of an egghead as a kid,” Robinson joked, laughing as Evans’s line was recently repeated to him.  “It was a big project.  My dad…

View original post 2,056 more words

CHANGING COURSE, PART 4: FAQ

For the finale of our look at Navy’s decision to join the Big East, I’m just going to do a Q&A format to expand on some of the things we touched on earlier and to cover any other lose ends. Each of these should probably be its own post, but whatever. This is running a lot longer than I thought it would, so it looks like there will be a Part 5 too.

Continue reading “CHANGING COURSE, PART 4: FAQ”

CHANGING COURSE, PART 3: CYNICAL, KNEE-JERK OPPOSITION

For the most part, the news that Navy will be joining the Big East in 2015 was met with a collective “meh” by most of the media. When I said that John Feinstein’s comments carry weight because he cares, I wasn’t kidding; there aren’t too many others voicing an opinion on the move. We did have this flaming bag of dog poo left on our collective front porch by Dan Wolken back in December, though. Feinstein’s comments at least came from someone who has a genuine concern for USNA and its football program; Wolken’s column sounds more like someone who never thought twice about either Army or Navy. Unfortunately, articles like this shape the opinion of casual fans that don’t know any better, so I should probably respond to it now that the move is official.

The premise of the column is that West Point is some virtuous entity above the fray, unwilling to compromise who they are just to compete in the greed-driven world of major college football. Wolken’s canonization of Army is misplaced on multiple levels.

Continue reading “CHANGING COURSE, PART 3: CYNICAL, KNEE-JERK OPPOSITION”

CHANGING COURSE, PART 1

One of the first lessons I learned as a young officer of the deck was that when dealing with contacts on the radar, you want to avoid putting the ship in extremis. Make course corrections to avoid collision early rather than waiting until the last second when you have fewer options and are more likely to panic. I kept thinking about that lesson as I listened to the teleconference announcing Navy football’s decision to accept the Big East’s invitation to join the conference. After 130 years of going it alone, Navy has made their course correction. We’ll be seeing Big East logos on Jack Stephens Field in 2015.

My journey through the five stages of grief is slowly reaching the acceptance stage, although I’m no more thrilled about the prospect of conference membership now than I was before. Self-determination with scheduling, television, and bowl games was a big part of Navy’s resurgence over the last decade, but there’s more to it than that. Navy’s independence goes back a lot longer than just those ten years, and for good reason. Athletic conferences were originally formed as alliances of similar schools across a particular region. As a service academy, there just aren’t enough schools similar to Navy for them to have formed that kind of a partnership. Navy plays the other service academies, obviously, and it makes sense to play Notre Dame as another national school. The rest of Navy’s schedule has always been pretty fluid, usually with a smattering of fellow Eastern independents mixed in with various other schools from around the country. Traditional opponents like Penn and William & Mary faded away, and new teams like Tulane, Rice, and Wake Forest took their place. As Navy’s place in the college football world has changed, independence has allowed their schedules to change along with them.

That’s all going to change in 2015, when Navy’s schedule will be set in stone. If that makes you more than a little nervous, it should. The risk of becoming the Vanderbilt of the Big East is very real, which is the main reason why Navy was independent in the first place. But this isn’t a decision that Navy is making because it wants to; Navy is moving to the Big East because it has to. Conference membership is not a new topic of conversation at the Naval Academy; both the superintendent and the newly-hired Chet Gladchuk mentioned it as far back as 2001. It was mentioned more than once on the teleconference that Navy and Big East officials had met every year since then. Navy could have joined the conference at any time. So why now?

The important thing to remember here is that the main driver in conference realignment is television. Broadcasters are paying conferences insane amounts of money for the rights to their games, but it isn’t without a catch. To get better ratings (and a greater return on their enormous investment), they’re going to want to see more matchups with BCS-level opponents and less of Louisiana-Monroe. We’re already seeing the effects of that push, with a trend toward 9-game conference schedules and with the recent scheduling pact between the Big Ten and Pac 12. These conferences aren’t just expanding; they’re consolidating. They’re playing more games against each other, and fewer games against teams that won’t draw in viewers. In essence, they are creating a new top tier of Division I football. There is even the potential for a formal split between the BCS conferences and non-BCS conferences. College football is at a crossroads, and the Naval Academy has to pick a direction to take.

Navy can’t afford to fade away like the aforementioned Penn and William & Mary. The Naval Academy has an obligation to position itself as a mainstream, national school. The football team is the most visible element of USNA and the best tool for increasing awareness among potential candidates for admission. With the role that the football program plays in supporting the mission, it is crucial for Navy to maintain that visibility by playing in the top tier of college football, whatever that is. Navy doesn’t have the muscle to force a seat at the table like the Notre Dame does. With the increasing power and influence of the major conferences, it appears less and less likely that Navy would be able to do so as an independent.

It probably seems ridiculous to paint such a bleak picture of the future of independence when, by most measures, Navy has so much going for it now. CBS is truly exceptional as a television partner, giving the Mids top billing on Saturdays, producing the fantastic A Game of Honor documentary, and even airing the spring game last year. Navy has bowl games lined up for the next 5 years. Attendance is high, and the program is coming off of one of the most successful decades in its history. Navy is doing just fine right now. But this isn’t a decision that’s being made for right now; this is a decision that’s being made to put the program in the best position to face the uncertainty of 10-20 years from now. If you wait until it becomes obvious that a move is necessary, it will be too late. So the superintendent did what any good OOD would do.

He changed course.