I’M NOT AN ENGLISH PROFESSOR, BUT…

Man, just when I think I’m going to get caught up on all the stuff I’ve been meaning to write, I get an avalanche of garbage to respond to that takes up all my time.

I have only myself to blame for this. Bruce Fleming, USNA’s outspoken English professor and self-appointed military expert, trots out more or less the same op-ed every year or two questioning the nature, and occasionally the existence, of the Naval Academy. A refined opportunist, he tweaks it slightly each time to maximize its effect, relating to whatever recent events he can use to suit his purpose before shopping it around to various publications. This time he exploits the Marcus Curry situation in the New York Times, telling readers that the service academies have “lost their way” and should either be “fixed or abolished.” If I was a smarter and more productive person, I would have had a canned response ready for his canned commentary. Unfortunately, my lack of foresight means that I have to start from scratch. So be it. Fleming’s argument that the service academies are on a bullet train to mediocrity is specious, relying on extrapolations based on anecdotal evidence and unfairly blaming athletes. His conclusions illustrate a fundamental lack of appreciation for what service academies are supposed to be. Continue reading “I’M NOT AN ENGLISH PROFESSOR, BUT…”

SLOTBACK, INTERRUPTED

It’s been over a week since the news broke, so I’m sure you’ve all heard by now that Marcus Curry has been dismissed from the football team for a violation of team rules and is likely to transfer.

Like many Navy fans, I hold my breath from January until August; news that breaks during the offseason is almost exclusively bad. You won’t read fun things like “Associated Press Retroactively Awards 1957 National Championship To Navy,” or “Yellowstone Caldera Erupts– Air Force Academy Swallowed Whole.” No, instead it’s always about somebody leaving the team, somebody getting hurt, someone looking to hire away a Navy coach, etc. It sucks, and this offseason has been no exception thanks to the drama surrounding Marcus Curry. Curry’s troubles came to the public’s attention back in January when it was reported that he had failed a drug test, yet was retained. Now the news of his dismissal from the team is picking at that scab, leading to a re-hashing of conversations that had mercifully ended despite the best efforts of random Facebook moms to stir up enough populist outrage to get a congressional inquiry or something. This latest episode of wailing and gnashing of teeth hasn’t really led to any new or insightful commentary other than serving as a vehicle for some people to take their indignant side out for a spin.

I think a lot of us figured that Marcus would transfer anyway, for his own sanity’s sake. Who would want to put up with the kind of mocking and public scrutiny that he’s seen for the last 4 months? Apparently he was, but couldn’t walk the straight and narrow line that was undoubtedly placed before him as a condition of his second chance. Oh well. We all know that Naval Academy life isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. Marcus gave it a shot, and it didn’t work out; just like countless others who, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, have left or will leave the Naval Academy. Attrition is inevitable in every class, and Curry is hardly the first person to be kicked off of the football team. Knowing this, I am absolutely dumbfounded as to why some people insist on making his impending transfer personal. Insulting him? Saying things like, “good riddance?” Really? Have we completely lost perspective? The Naval Academy needs young men and women who are willing to give it a shot, even if some of them come up short. Curry, for all his alleged faults, was still willing to attempt something that most people his age will not. There is value in the attempt, even if it was ultimately misguided. As a graduate I am far less ashamed of anything Marcus Curry has ever done than I am of those who would spit on him as he walks out the door. Tell some people that they’re the “best and brightest” enough, and you’ll create the kind of arrogance that gives Academy graduates a bad name. It’s the stereotype that well-adjusted alums have been fighting for generations, and until this episode I thought it might have been somewhat unfounded. Holy crap was I wrong.

None of this is to say that Marcus Curry is without blame for his own situation. He made his mistakes just like we all have in life. The difference is that the court of public opinion doesn’t rule on our worth as a person based on our mistakes. It is unfortunate, and more than a little disturbing, the way Curry has been dissected in the media. Admittedly, the nature of the Naval Academy makes headline news out of things that might be footnotes at other schools; if a player has a positive drug test, it’s a big deal. That comes with the territory. On the other hand, that isn’t an excuse to broadcast Curry’s entire conduct record to a predominantly clueless audience that has no idea what something like “demerits” at USNA entail. The Naval Academy is not a reality show where we all get to vote undeserving mids off the island. Those of us who are married probably don’t want all our arguments to become episodes of The Marriage Ref.  I’m quite thankful that my conduct record wasn’t public; I inherited my father’s “you rate what you skate” approach to Academy conduct matters. Marcus deserved the same privacy that any other mid expects in Academy matters.

But again, that’s just a repeat of things we’ve already said. Meanwhile, the team has to find a way to replace their top slotback. Conventional wisdom regurgitators that populate internet message boards will say something like “that just means someone else will step up” or some other manner of rah-rah, although that undervalues the contributions each individual player makes to the team. Starters are starters for a reason, and losing Marcus Curry shouldn’t be so easily dismissed.

Curry was a big part of the 2009 offense. Among other things, he was the team’s leading reciever, averaging nearly 30 yards per catch. The bulk of his numbers came in Navy’s biggest games; he had 101 yards and 2 spectacular touchdowns against Ohio State, 5 catches for 97 yards against Missouri, and a 25-yard TD reception against Army. With Bobby Doyle graduating, the Mids now lose their top two receivers going into 2010. Losing receivers probably isn’t the worst thing that could happen to this offense, but it certainly isn’t good. These were some clutch catches, especially in Ohio State and Mizzou games. I don’t think you could say that any random schmo could step in and make those plays.

Of course, the Mids won’t be asking any random schmo to step in and make those plays, since slotback is widely considered the deepest position on the team. In fact, there are probably 5-6 guys who are ready to step in as the #2 guy right now. The question now is whether any of them are ready to be the featured slotback. Curry shouldered a hefty load; despite missing three games due to injury, he still had 46% of all slotback carries last year. That’s the third-highest percentage since 2004:

2008 Shun White 73.7%
2006 Reggie Campbell 53.2%
2009 Marcus Curry 46.2%
2004 Eric Roberts 37.7%
2007 Shun White 35.4%
2004 Frank Divis 32.8%
2007 Reggie Campbell 32.2%
2005 Marco Nelson 30.9%
2007 Zerbin Singleton 30.4%
2005 Reggie Campbell 29.3%

Are any of the remaining slotbacks ready to assume that kind of responsibility? Gee Gee Greene is the leading candidate athletically, but the transition from freshman to #1 guy is a lot to ask. Curry did it, so it’s certainly possible; but it isn’t something that should be taken for granted. The other possibility is that there won’t be a clear-cut #1 A-back, and that carries will be distributed a little more randomly. Either way, Curry’s absence means a change of plans for what was one of the most stable positions going into 2010.

DRAFT RECAP

If you really think about it, if someone wanted to design the worst television show ever, it would probably look something like the NFL draft. I mean, it’s a guy reading a name every 10 minutes. For whatever reason, we all watch it anyway. For me, other than seeing who the Chargers take and pretending I know if it’s a good pick or not, I like to see how many draftees played against Navy during their college careers. Here’s the list for the 2010 draft:

ROUND 1

Anthony Davis/OL/6’6/325/Rutgers
Sean Weatherspoon/LB/6’2/245/Missouri
Devin McCourty/CB/5’11/185/Rutgers

ROUND 2

Koa Misi/OLB/6’3/263/Utah
Zane Beadles/OL/6’4/305/Utah
Jimmy Clausen/QB/6’3/223/Notre Dame
Toby Gerhart/RB/6’1/237/Stanford
Golden Tate/WR/5’11/195/Notre Dame

ROUND 3

D’Anthony Smith/DT/6’2/300/Louisiana Tech
Emmanuel Sanders/WR/5’11/180/SMU
Brandon Ghee/CB/6’0/191/Wake Forest

ROUND 4

Thad Gibson/OLB/6’2/240/Ohio St.

ROUND 5

Robert Johnson/FS/6’2/200/Utah
Chris DeGeare/G/6’4/335/Wake Forest
Stevenson Sylvester/LB/6’2/230/Utah

ROUND 6

Dennis Morris/TE/6’2/265/Louisiana Tech
Sam Young/T/6’8/320/Notre Dame
Nate Byham/TE/6’4/265/Pittsburgh
Eric Olsen/G/6’4/305/Notre Dame

ROUND 7

R.J. Stanford/DB/5’11/180/Utah
Dorin Dickerson/TE/6’2/230/Pittsburgh
C.J. Wilson/DL/6’4/278/East Carolina
Jim Dray/TE/6’5/253/Stanford
Ryan D’Imperio/LB/6’1/241/Rutgers
Doug Worthington/DT/6’6/276/Ohio St.
Kurt Coleman/S/5’11/195/Ohio St.
Austin Spitler/LB/6’3/234/Ohio St.
Erik Lorig/DE/6’4/265/Stanford

These are people who actually played in games against Navy. If a drafted player’s school played Navy, but that player didn’t get into the game, I didn’t list him.

WRAPPING UP THE SPRING

Navy’s spring practice came to a close last weekend with the annual Blue-Gold game, won by the Blue squad (1st team offense, 2nd team defense), 38-7. It was a good time. There was a decent-sized crowd (relatively speaking), and Coach Niumatalolo was hooked up to a microphone, providing color commentary while standing behind the play. It was a good time. For me, the spring game is somewhat weird to watch. Assuming that this isn’t the first time that you’ve seen this blog, you’ve probably noticed that my favorite part of football is the chess match– the schematic duel that unfolds as coaches attempt to out-maneuver each other. But in spring scrimmages, you don’t really have that element. The coaches aren’t trying to win. They’re trying to evaluate. Fortunately, there was still a little razzle-dazzle tossed in for fun.

The 45 points scored were the most in a spring game since the 31-27 final in 2002, which was probably a good thing. Most Blue-Gold games are pretty low-scoring, but I was hoping that the offense would be extra-motivated coming into this one since they were harshly criticized for their performance in the previous scrimmage a week earlier. With each squad scoring a touchdown on their opening drives, I wasn’t disappointed. Coach Niumatalolo was quick to point out after the scrimmage that the defenses used in the scrimmage were very vanilla, though, so the offenses shouldn’t have been challenged too much from a mental standpoint.

Anyway, some position-by-position thoughts on the spring:

Quarterback: Kriss Proctor seems to be accumulating comparisons to Kaipo like the Gulf of Mexico is accumulating oil. Last year, it about was his similar experience in the offense, having run an option attack in high school. Later, it was his awkward passing that seemed to mirror Kaipo’s attempts during his sophomore year– sort of like a fisherman chucking a crab trap into the bay. After Proctor ran for 100 yards and 3 touchdowns in the first half of the spring game, Coach Niumatalolo had this to say about Navy’s backup and heir apparent to Ricky Dobbs:

“A very talented kid … we’ve all known that about Kriss. Along with Kaipo, (he’s) one of the fastest quarterbacks we’ve had here,” Niumatalolo said. “You can see that it’s a little easier said than done getting him on the ground. The kid is very elusive.”

Niumat’s comparison of Proctor’s speed to Kaipo’s sort of caught me off guard, but after watching him go all Garden Weasel in mulching the defense on some killer midline option runs, it’s a tough point to argue. We didn’t get to see much of that in his two starts last year, running for his life against Temple and swimming for it against Wake Forest. Hopefully we don’t get to see much if it again until the next spring game, unless it’s in the 4th quarter of another Rice-like blowout.

Speaking of not wanting to see Proctor again for a while, Coach Niumatalolo said that Ricky’s recovery is coming along nicely, to the point where if this was a regular season game, he probably would have played. It’s good that he was able to get some non-contact reps this spring; even in his MVP performance in the Texas Bowl, Ricky still missed a fair amount of reads. While I’m happy that Proctor appears to have made the most of his extra snaps, hopefully it doesn’t keep Ricky from experiencing the “senior enlightenment” that graced his predecessors between their junior and senior years. 

While Kriss’ running was impressive, I don’t think too many of us were worried about that. His passing is a different story, and perhaps the biggest QB development from this spring is how much it appears to have improved. Not to the point where I’d call it good, necessarily, but at least to the point where it isn’t a handicap. Most of his throws were of the short & simple variety, but he also tossed a beautiful rainbow to Bo Snelson, hitting the slotback in stride over the middle for a 56-yard touchdown. The progress is a good sign.

Travis Keating was having the better game of the 3rd-stingers up until the point he got his bell rung and had to leave the game. Apparently he did a pretty good job this spring for someone just stepping into the position. My gut feeling is still that the #3 quarterback come Labor Day is not yet on the roster.

Linebacker: With more turnover than any other position on the team, this is the battle that everyone was looking forward to. After finally seeing them for myself, I’m not sure I know any more than I did going into the game. It was hard to get a read on the linebackers, especially since the defense was so basic. They definitely look the part physically– this is by far the biggest group of LBs I’ve ever seen at Navy, and they hit hard. You’ll remember, though, that even when our defense was terrible back in 2007, there was never any question about their athleticism. The problems came from a lack of experience and not knowing where to go and how to line up. Of course, back then Coach Green had to start a bunch of freshmen and sophomores; these guys are mostly juniors and seniors. My gut feeling is that they’ll be fine, but it’s still something that we won’t know until they get into an actual game. On one hand, it’s kind of disturbing to see Kriss Proctor weaving his way through the middle of the field. A week earlier, though, the defense absolutely crushed the offense.

I spent a lot of time watching Collin Sturdivant, since I was curious to see how he’d make the transition from DE to LB. He didn’t disappoint, registering 4 tackles. It’s easy to see why he was moved to his new position, and why he’s challenging for playing time already. The offense had a tough time blocking him.

Offensive Line/Defensive Line: This is one of those situations where I’m not sure if the defensive line is that good or if the offensive line is that bad. I think it’s more of the former; more specifically, I think the DL is deeper at this point. That’s especially true at nose guard, with Bothel, Burge, and Marks. The guards and centers were getting blown up all night, and I think a lot of that is because the 2nd & 3rd string defensive line is just farther along than their offensive counterparts. While Shane Bothel is sitting on top of the current depth chart at NG, both Chase Burge and Jared Marks will challenge him for the starting job, with all of them likely to get playing time. I don’t think the same can be said on the offensive line, where there’s more of an established hierarchy. Mike McCarthy’s departure at center left Kahikolu Pescaia took most of the snaps with the second team, and he was in a dogfight on every snap. The defensive line’s dominance kept the fullbacks from having much of an impact on the game, other than 1 or 2 decent runs.

Slotbacks: Throughout the spring, the coaches have called slotback the deepest position on the team. They lived up to that billing in the Blue-Gold game. All of them– and I mean ALL of them– had at least one big run. The most impressive came from Gee Gee Greene, who juked and weaved his way down the sideline for a big gain only to be called back by a holding penalty at the line of scrimmage. The run looked a little bit like something Karlos Whittaker uncorked on Stanford back in 2005. Gee Gee seems to be sort of a forgotten man in the slotback mix. Well, maybe “forgotten” is the wrong term, but he definitely hasn’t been talked about as much as the other A-backs in published reports from practice. It’s hard not to talk about him now. In the speed and agility tests conducted this spring, Gee Gee is the only player to be listed in the top 5 in every category. His habit of dancing around in the backfield rather than putting his head down and picking up yards was frustrating at times, but when it finally clicks for him– and it looks like we’re getting close– that physical ability will reach its full potential.

All the slotbacks can run; where they fall on the depth chart seems to be determined by how well they block. Some were definitely better than others, although I admit I wasn’t always paying attention. When I was, Aaron Santiago stood out to me.

Bo Snelson’s touchdown catch was almost as impressive as Kriss Proctor’s throw. He got behind the safeties, never broke stride, and got just enough of the ball on his fingertips to be able to haul it in. A well-executed play all around.

Secondary: Mario Washington played on both sides of the ball in the spring game. He looked comfortable enough at cornerback, although he wasn’t challenged too much. While his is the more high-profile switch, the bigger story to me has been the play of Cory James. The slotback-turned-cornerback has played his way onto the depth chart, and could be as high as #2 if Mario sticks to WR. At 5-8, 160, James certainly isn’t the biggest player on the roster, but he doesn’t shy away from contact. Sometimes players get re-energized when they get a chance at a new position, and that appears to be the case with Cory. Third-string FS Jordan Fraser also had a good game with 4 tackles.

A good number of starters either sat out the game or only played a series or two, so we didn’t really get a look at the team that will be taking the field against Maryland in September. Trying to get a feel for each position in one game is sort of like taking a drink from a firehose. It’s a lot to take in, and this is far from a comprehensive summary. These are just a few things that caught my eye, mixed in with some other thoughts.

YOU’RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER BOAT

The home portion of Navy’s two-game series with Ohio State will be played at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore to open the 2014 season. I’m sure everyone assumed this was going to happen all along, but now it has the hard candy coating of official-ness. Those of you hoping to see the game played at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium are probably disappointed, but if you want to give up a Baltimore payday then you’re too hopelessly confused to have your opinion count for anything anyway. FedEx Field was apparently also considered, but thankfully ruled out since nobody likes looking at 30,000 empty seats.

Now that this is official, the next question is where to play Notre Dame that year. Will Navy play two games in Baltimore? Maybe FedEx Field is in the running for this game instead. Or perhaps the Notre Dame game will hit the road to somewhere like, oh I don’t know… Jacksonville? MAKE IT HAPPEN, CHET!

THE GEORGIA SOUTHERN GAME IS SLIGHTLY MORE INTERESTING

When Paul Johnson left for Georgia Tech, the Georgia Southern game sort of seemed out of place on Navy’s future schedules. The schools don’t have any real connection other than Johnson, so the logical assumption is that Navy scheduled GSU for his sake. Once PJ left, I figured Southern would come of the schedule. Or not. I guess it’s cheaper to keep her, because the game’s still there, and it looks a lot different now than it did a year ago. Georgia Southern is now coached by Jeff Monken, who apparently doesn’t believe in his old boss’ “no transfer” philosophy; Georgia Tech quarterback Jaybo Shaw is reportedly headed to Statesboro. I’ll let our bevy of Tech readers tell us their opinion of Shaw, but at the very least he’s well-versed in the offense; not only from his time at Georgia Tech, but also because he ran something similar in high school.

Now, GSU is nowhere near the team they were in their heyday, and on paper Navy should win without that much of a problem. But coming off of a short week… after what’s sure to be a tough, emotional game against Maryland… with a familiar face on the opposite sideline who knows how you think… who now has an experienced, I-A quarterback to lead his offense…

SIGNING DAY, IF YOU CARE

It’s been two weeks since National Letter of Intent Signing Day, and college football fans around the country have spent the last several days either celebrating or lamenting their lists of incoming football recruits depending on what Rivals and Scout tell them to do. Navy fans aren’t all that different; we want to know what the future holds as much as anyone else. Signing day itself, though, doesn’t quite hold the same significance. Signing day is the first day that recruits are allowed to sign binding letters of intent under the NLI program. Once coaches receive a recruit’s signed letter committing them to the school, they’re allowed to talk about them. One exception to this is at the service academies, who don’t participate in the letter of intent program. Recruits are given certificates to sign at their high school’s signing day ceremonies, but unlike LOIs, they aren’t binding contracts. That’s why Navy won’t officially release its recruit list until I-Day. Not only that, but recruiting doesn’t end on signing day, either. The weekend or two after signing day are usually big recruiting weekends in Annapolis. And if another school didn’t fill all of its needs with its recruiting class, they can still go after service academy recruits. Signing day is more of a symbolic end to the recruiting season than a real one.

Continue reading “SIGNING DAY, IF YOU CARE”

WHEN IT SUCKS TO BE A NAVY BLOGGER

Anyone that decides to become a service academy football blogger had better be prepared to discuss topics that have nothing to do with what happens on the field. I suppose the same could be said about those who write about other teams as well, but the public, mission-driven nature of service academies gives a much different context to off-field issues than those at State U. The effects of these situations are usually more far-reaching than a simple reshuffling of the depth chart. Such is the case this weekend as it is being reported that starting slotback Marcus Curry tested positive for marijuana on a random drug test, was processed for separation, and retained by Naval Academy Superintendent VADM Jeffrey Fowler.

With Privacy Act restrictions making actual facts in the case difficult to come by–technically, as a conduct matter we shouldn’t know anything about it– many people have turned to assumption and rumor to fill the void. The reaction to this amalgam of information and misinformation has been nothing if not predictable. Blogs and message boards have boiled over with outrage. The Navy Times, never a publication overly concerned with the veracity of its reports, picked up on the discontent and ran a story citing these dubious sources. The animus stems from the perceived preferential treatment given to a football player with a policy that is supposed to be one of “zero tolerance.”

It is expected, and not altogether wrong, that your first reaction would be to question the Superintendent’s decision. Athletics are a means to an end at the Naval Academy, not an end unto themselves. It is right for anyone who cares about the Naval Academy and its mission to guard against policies that would appear to compromise that mission. On the other hand, there are also people who refuse to acknowledge that Division I football plays any role in fulfilling that mission, and many of them are eager to take advantage of instances like this to further their agenda of abolishing major college athletics at USNA. It is important to avoid being so overwhelmed by populist indignation that it corrupts your own ability to reason. As you wade through the acrimony, there are a few other points you should consider.

First and foremost, it is necessary to clarify what exactly the Navy’s policy is regarding drug testing. “Zero tolerance” is a catch phrase designed to be easy for service members to remember, but it isn’t policy. While many people incorrectly assume that “zero tolerance” means that a positive drug test automatically means separation from the Navy, that isn’t true. The actual policy is outlined in MILPERSMAN 1910-146, which reads:

1. Policy

a. Processing is mandatory for the following:

(1) Positive urinalysis that was tested and confirmed positive at a Navy Drug Screening Lab (NAVDRUGLAB) or other DOD-approved lab. If the commanding officer (CO) determines the urinalysis result was caused by administrative errors (e.g., faulty local chain of custody, evidence of tampering) or the drug use was not wrongful (e.g., prescribed medication, unknowing ingestion), then the member shall not be identified as a drug abuser and the positive urinalysis is not a drug abuse incident. When this determination is made the command shall notify, via official correspondence, Navy Personnel Command (NAVPERSCOM), Fleet Support Department (PERS-6) and the command’s immediate senior in command (ISIC) of the circumstances that warranted such a determination.

A positive drug test means that the administrative process for separation must begin. However, it is the commanding officer’s responsibility to determine the outcome of the process based on whether or not there are circumstances that would indicate that the urinalysis results were caused by wrongful use. Contrary to the impression you might have been given, the Navy does not seek to create policies that take tough decisions out of the hands of its commanding officers. Instead, the Navy expects men and women who have shown an aptitude for command to be able to make decisions like this in the best interests of their command and the Navy. On top of that, there is oversight; if the Superintendent decides that retention is warranted, he is required to disclose his reasoning to the Navy Personnel Command as well as his own chain of command (in this case, the CNO). While some may try to convince you that VADM Fowler’s decision is a violation of Navy policy, it isn’t. It is also extremely unlikely that the Superintendent sent a memo to the CNO saying, “I retained him because he’s a football player.” Common sense would lead any reasonable person to conclude that there is simply more to the story than that.

If common sense doesn’t give you pause for thought, the Supe’s own track record should. This is, of course, the same man that resolved to “remove the distraction” of those activities he deemed “secondary, optional, and conditional.” Fowler enacted strict new regulations on midshipmen upon assuming his post, in part because of the negative press the school received following high-profile conduct cases involving football players. The Superintendent has a history of not only cracking down on misconduct, but showing disdain– not favoritism– toward any extracurricular activity that doesn’t directly relate to warfare training. He has also demonstrated that he is keenly aware of the damage caused to the Academy’s reputation by negative press. Despite all of this, he still made the decision to retain the accused midshipman. If he acted on such negativity in the past, why would he make a decision like this– which was sure to create the same adverse reaction– without legitimate cause? It would have been much, much easier for VADM Fowler to have kicked Curry out of school and avoid this maelstrom. Where was this alleged favoritism when Nate Frazier, arguably the most important player on the team going into the season, was separated from the Academy in August? The belief that special consideration was given to a football player makes little sense in the context of Fowler’s past decisions. Again, one must consider that there is probably more to the story than anonymous leaks are choosing to reveal.

The truth is that we don’t know anything. Nobody wants to admit that, because that would make it harder to advance their agenda. Nevertheless, we do not know the evidence, sworn statements, and other considerations that the Superintendent used to make his decision. We are also looking at this decision in a vacuum; even if some of us have anecdotal evidence of a particular case or two, we do not know how the Superintendent has ruled in all of them. Without these things, it is simply impossible to responsibly make a claim of favoritism. You can’t say that Curry’s case is an exception to the norm without knowing the norm. Then again, nobody cares to leak any information about cases that don’t involve football players. That’s the problem faced by athletes, women, and (to a lesser extent) minorities at USNA. Detractors don’t consider them as individuals; only as representatives of the particular demographic they want to criticize, and never receiving the benefit of the doubt. Curry could explain himself to the public, but the kind of classy individual who’d go digging around his MySpace page looking for ways to slander him won’t believe what he says anyway. The Superintendent is legally unable to explain the details that led to his decision. That means only one side has a voice in situations like this, a fact that less scrupulous types are more than happy to take advantage of.

Something that is largely being overlooked in all the furor over the Supe’s decision on Curry is the fact that so many midshipmen have not only commented on the ruling on blogs and message boards, but actually contacted the media about it. This is the second time in the last three years that this has happened. If there’s anything that should give you concern about the future of the Naval Academy, it’s this. The very first lesson that midshipmen are taught is that before you can lead, you have to learn how to follow. It is a lesson that apparently was completely lost on some of them. This was a decision that was the Superintendent’s to make, and midshipmen’s to live with. That didn’t stop a few coddled, Generation-Y douchebags that have spent a lifetime getting trophies for finishing in last place and being told how special they are from contacting blogs and newspapers to spread rumors about Curry, denying him the anonymity he is legally entitled to– anonymity that these cowards are unwilling to give up themselves. The irony lost on these tools while they pass judgment on Curry’s fitness to serve is that no CO in the fleet wants to fill his or her wardroom with self-righteous jackasses that would run to the media whenever they disagreed with a command decision. In deciding for themselves which regulations just don’t apply to them, these people violate everything they pretend to stand for.

This is not a defense of Curry’s actions. I have no knowledge of the situation with which to build one. I am also not necessarily the biggest fan of VADM Fowler, and have written as much. This is instead an appeal to reason; to admit to the limits of your own knowledge of the case as presented to the Superintendent, to consider the context of his past decisions, and to avoid passing judgment in the lowest-common-denominator court of uninformed public opinion.

RICKY DOBBS FOR HEISMAN

I’m sure that by now you guys have figured out that there are certain elements of the college football mainstream that I have little use for. There are a few things that the team and the program can control; winning the Commander-In-Chief’s Trophy, having a winning season, and earning a bowl berth among them. Maintaining this standard is what should drive the program. Yet for whatever reason, fans tend to get spun up about all kinds of ancillary nonsense. Recruiting rankings are a joke, but there are people who not only swear by them, but defer to them rather than trust what they see on the field. Some people hold out hope for amorphic “signature wins,” although there’s no criteria for what constitutes a “signature win,” and no extra credit towards bowl eligibility should this mythical milestone be achieved. Media attention and top 25 polls can be fun, but validation from people that are largely unconcerned and/or unfamiliar with Navy football should hardly be a goal of the program. With the unique restrictions placed on service academies, Navy football operates under a different set of rules than the world of college football at large. Sure, a good enough season might yield a top 25 ranking, and the team is capable of beating everyone on the schedule. But to set these kinds of things as program standards in the name of “progress” makes little sense, and can only lead to frustration– or worse.

Continue reading “RICKY DOBBS FOR HEISMAN”