Navy Is 2-2

That’s because they didn’t really beat Air Force last week, according to Falcon cornerback Carson Bird:

“We realized Navy didn’t really beat us, and that was huge for us to realize,” senior cornerback Carson Bird said. “They really didn’t beat us. We beat ourselves.”

Same old Air Force. Fisher would be proud.

Look, I know that when coaches show players film of the last game, those players come out of there knowing that their mistakes are correctable. I get that. I would expect players and coaches to come out after a loss and focus on the mistakes they made and how they’re going to fix them. Nobody needs to be kissing their opponent’s collective butt after a loss.

But that is a far cry from what Bird said. How hard is it to say that the team made mistakes, and just leave it at that? He didn’t just say that Navy didn’t beat them, he repeated it for emphasis! Maybe Jake Schaller will remember things like this the next time he wants to write about how tired he thinks Navy’s “respect” routine is. Paul Johnson doesn’t make this stuff up. It happens every year. Apparently Navy hasn’t been good enough to beat Air Force for 5 straight years. They’ve just been the beneficiaries of Air Force repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot. This is the sort of thing that Johnson is talking about when he says that Navy must be the “luckiest team in America.”

So I guess Air Force is 4-2. No word yet on whether their victory over themselves will count as a conference win.

Dust gets thick after 5 years

/maryland

Well, we have our answer. Navy and Maryland won’t be playing in 2010. Debbie Yow doesn’t want to wait any longer and needs to fill her schedule.

I know that a lot of people enjoyed the 2005 game, and it wouldn’t have killed me to see it happen again. I’m not going to lose any sleep over this, though. Yow went to the media and tried to coerce Navy into making a deal, and Chet didn’t bite. Good for him. If Yow’s methods are an indication of the respect that she has for the Naval Academy, I’d guess that the terms of the deal weren’t going to be very equitable, either. That’s complete speculation, obviously. Just a hunch.

Anyway, no word yet on any additions to Navy’s 2010 schedule. The last schedule that was published in the media guide indicated that there were still three games left to be added. Navy is usually somewhat tight-lipped about its schedules since they can change on a dime.

UPDATE: Amazing how things can change when someone bothers to tell both sides of the story.

More here.

AND YET THERE’S MORE: This story just won’t give up. So now Debbie Yow wants to talk again? Sounds like someone had a little bit of egg on her face after it was revealed that, after all that grandstanding, she had backed out of an agreement. If this game happens, we can call it the Bill Wagner Bowl.

TV for Navy Basketball

The Patriot League announced its ESPNU TV lineup today, and it includes two Navy games; at Bucknell and at home against Army. Also included in the Navy release was the news that the San Diego State game would be covered by CSTV, bringing the total number of televised games this year to seven. The Army game will actually be a men’s/women’s Army-Navy doubleheader, with both games televised. And don’t forget that all of Navy’s home games will be shown online for CSTV All-Access subscribers.

Navy’s televised games:

11/23 vs. Seton Hall     TBA  CN8
11/24 vs. Penn/UVa     TBA  CN8
12/17 at San Diego State     7:00 pm (PT)  CSTV
1/11 at Bucknell     7:00 pm (ET)  ESPNU
1/27 vs. Army     Noon (ET)  ESPNU
2/23 at Army     2:00 pm (ET)  CBS
3/1 at Colgate     1:00 pm (ET)  Time-Warner Sports

Patriot League on ESPNU/ESPN2:

1/11 Navy at Bucknell     7:00 pm (ET)
1/18 Bucknell at Holy Cross     9:00 pm (ET)
1/27 Army at Navy     Noon (ET)
2/2 Lehigh at Holy Cross     Noon (ET)
2/3 Army at Bucknell     Noon (ET)
2/10 Lehigh at American     Noon (ET)
2/16 Holy Cross at Bucknell (ESPN2)     6:00 pm (ET)
2/17 American at Colgate     Noon (ET)
2/29 Holy Cross at Lehigh     9:00 pm (ET)
3/14 Championship Game (ESPN2)     4:30 pm (ET)

Patriot League Women’s Basketball on ESPNU:

1/20 Holy Cross at Bucknell     Noon (ET)
1/27 Army at Navy     2:30 pm (ET)
3/12 Championship Game     TBA

Kyle’s Back In Business

The Patriots, who had claimed Kyle Eckel off of waivers and placed him on their practice squad, signed him to the active roster today.

http://www.patriots.com/news/index.cfm?ac=latestnewsdetail&pid=28058&pcid=47

UPDATE: Didn’t take long for Kyle to get into a game. He lined up at tailback while the Pats were running out the clock, got three carries, and picked up a first down. He looked good. Now that the Chargers have been Norved and any optimism that I might have had for them has been crushed, I don’t think there’s anything I want more from this NFL season than to see Kyle Eckel with a Super Bowl ring.

Karma 4, Carney 0

We all know the story: on his official recruiting trip to the Naval Academy, Air Force quarterback Shaun Carney announced to Navy players and coaches that he would not be attending USNA. The reason? Because he didn’t think that Navy would ever beat Air Force, and he apparently wanted everyone to know it. That was back in 2002.  After having just watched Air Force beat Navy 48-7  for their eighth win in nine tries against the Mids, he probably thought that backing up that talk would be no problem. He was wrong. Navy defeated Air Force 31-20 on Saturday afternoon for their fifth straight win in the series, and fourth with Carney at the helm of the Falcons’ offense.

It’s hard to blame a kid for wanting to go to a winning program. But if he had kept his motives to himself instead of insulting his hosts, perhaps he wouldn’t have become karma’s diaper. Of course, karma had a little help. Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada, Reggie Campbell, and Zerbin Singleton each had huge runs, and the Navy defense stiffened when it had to.

The game was a back-and forth affair for the first three quarters. Air Force had a pretty good game plan. When a defense is having trouble playing with discipline, the option is a good way to attack it. Air Force was able to get big gains running the option, particularly on the pitch. As expected, Air Force also incorporated a lot of misdirection into their offense, with WR Chad Hall scoring twice on end-arounds. Hall had 108 receiving yards to go along with those two rushing touchdowns. Air Force didn’t have much trouble moving the ball, rolling up 474 yards of total offense.

But as was also expected, the Falcons had trouble executing when it counted. In the first quarter, Air Force had second and goal from the Navy 10 yard line. An errant pitch from Carney to Hall led to an 11-yard loss, leading to 3rd and goal from the 21. Air Force would have to kick a field goal. In the second quarter, Air Force was stopped on 4th down at the Navy 5 yard line thanks to an excellent play from Navy LB Tony Haberer. Navy couldn’t move the ball on the ensuing drive and went 3 and out. Air Force got the ball at midfield following Greg Veteto’s punt. They were able to drive to the Navy 23, but missed a 41-yard field goal attempt. Air Force’s defense forced another 3 and out on Navy’s opening drive of the third quarter. After the punt, the Falcons were able to drive to the Navy 3. On 3rd and goal, fullback Ryan Williams was open for a sure touchdown but bobbled Carney’s pass. Air Force had to kick another field goal.

Despite these miscues, Air Force had a 20-17 lead in the 3rd quarter after Chad Hall’s second touchdown. That is where Navy took over.

After Air Force took the lead, Kaipo opened the next drive with a 53-yard pass to a streaking OJ Washington. The play put Navy at the Air Force 20, and the Mids chipped away from there, converting on two 4th downs and scoring the go-ahead touchdown. Air Force was able to take their next drive all the way to the Navy 9 yard line, but then the meltdown began. Mistake #1 was a personal foul call against the Zoomies on a ridiculously late hit after a pass to Chad Hall. Mistake #2 was a false start. Mistake #3 was a holding penalty on the next play, which gave Air Force 3rd and a nautical mile from all the way back at the Navy 39.

It’s here that Air Force coach Troy Calhoun put the frosting on the gaffe cake. Since it would take a pretty desperate heave to try to convert on 3rd down from the 39, the smart play would have been to throw for 10-15 yards and put yourself in position for a field goal. Navy had been allowing completions underneath all afternoon, and Air Force was only down 24-20. A field goal would have meant that even if Navy scored a touchdown on their next drive, it would still have been a one posession game. But Calhoun didn’t play for the field goal. Instead, he had Shaun Carney try to throw to a triple-covered Chad Hall in the end zone. The pass was short, and Air Force was forced to punt. Navy took over on the Air Force 20, and Kaipo made the Falcons pay.

The Hawaiian word for “to run fast” is holo’ino. I went into the Navy media guide to see if that’s one of Kaipo’s middle names, but it isn’t. It might not be his name, but it’s the best way to describe what happened next. One play after Eric Kettani ran up the middle for two yards, Kaipo ran the triple option to the left. The Air Force linebacker that was responsible for covering him bit the cheese, and Kaipo ran for the fastest 78 yards ever run on fieldturf. Kaipo might not be the shiftiest guy on the field, but once there’s an opening where he can start his long strides, nobody will catch him. It happened against Temple, against Ball State, and again on Saturday versus Air Force.

That TD run put Navy up 11. Air Force got the ball back with 9:18 left to play, but a Jim Ollis fumble was recovered by Blake Carter. Navy was able to run some time off the clock, and by the time Air Force had the ball again there was only 5:31 left for them to get two scores. They were able to move into field goal range to get one of the two scores they needed, but Ryan Harrison couldn’t get the ball above a leaping Jesse Iwuji, putting the finishing touches on a mistake-filled afternoon for the Falcons.

Extra Points

— The win overshadowed the problem, but Navy’s placekicking woes continued. Joey Bullen’s 51-yard attempt might have been a bit of a stretch to begin with, but he had a 42-yard attempt blocked that could have put Navy up by 14. It’s one thing to miss kicks, but it’s another to not even be able to get them past the line of scrimmage. With a stretch of tough games coming up, it’s crucial to be able to take whatever points we can get. This problem has already burned us once this season.

— Navy had a very clear speed advantage against Air Force. Reggie Campbell and Zerbin Singleton were able to make big gains on the outside, and Kaipo would’ve traveled back in time if he had a flux capacitor strapped to him. Defensively, we still made a lot of the same mistakes we’ve been making all year (@#$% missed tackles). However, our speed was so good relative to Air Force that they couldn’t convert our mistakes into the big plays that Duke or Ball State were able to make. Our recruiting has been paying off.

— I wish I could say that I was shocked to see Air Force LB John Rabold take a swing at Zerb, but I wasn’t. At least Calhoun took him out of the game. I’m not so sure that DeBerry would have. It’s hard to believe that he could be so frustrated, since this was “just another game on the schedule.”

— Air Force athletic director Hans Mueh wasted no time in doing what Air Force does best: run his mouth. Regarding Air Force’s 5-game losing streak to Navy, Mueh said, “We’ll end it next year. Guaranteed.” What a dope. I’m sure that Troy Calhoun appreciates being put on the spot like that. After all, it isn’t like Mueh himself has anything to do with whether or not his prediction comes to pass. Anyone who pays attention to Air Force athletics will tell you that this isn’t the first time Mueh has said something stupid.

— Things aren’t going to get any easier for Air Force. 430 of their 474 yards of offense was generated by seniors. In contrast, Navy started only 3 seniors on defense.

— Air Force needs to pick a uniform and stick with it. They get uglier and uglier every time they’re resdesigned.

Birddog Game Balls

— Reggie Campbell and Zerb Singleton: Navy’s leading rusher in each of the previous 4 years against Air Force had been the fullback. Determined not to let that happen again, they frequently brought linebackers to the line of scrimmage to plug holes up the middle. That made it important for the A-backs to produce, and they did. Reggie and Zerb combined for 106 yards and two touchdowns while averaging nearly 9 yards per carry. I’m not sure whose touchdown was cooler: Zerb geting airborne or Reggie’s slalom run through the Air Force defense. A’s make plays.

— Ram Vela: Ram Vela made the unusual move from cornerback to linebacker for this game, and it was a little bit of genius from Buddy Green. Ram had six tackles, including one for a loss. One of the ways that coaches measure a defensive player’s effort is by looking to see how far away they are from the ball at the end of a play. Ram was always around the ball. With his DB speed and experience, Ram also is a bit of a force multiplier, giving Coach Green more options in pass coverage. Vela found himself in one on one coverage with Chad Hall a couple of times. Hall is Air Force’s fastest player. Vela also gave Navy a little bit of speed in rushing the passer.

Actually, I’m a little surprised that Buddy didn’t play more man to man defense in this game. Hall is the only really fast guy that Air Force had, and Carney never had much of a reputation for delivering the long ball. Not that it really mattered in the end.

— Tony Haberer: Tony saved his biggest plays for when they were needed the most: stopping Jim Ollis on 4th down, and sacking Shaun Carney in the 4th quarter to force Air Force into a field goal attempt that was blocked.

— Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada: Have you heard? He’s fast. He should do one of those “Man Vs. Beast” TV shows where he can race a zebra or something.

Game Week: Air Force

 

I don’t like Air Force. I think that Fisher DeBerry was a hall-of-fame coach, but also a hall-of-fame jerk. I think that Shaun Carney was unbelievably arrogant and disrespectful after telling a reporter before last year’s Air Force-Army game how the Falcons were going to run up the score on the Black Knights. It warms my heart to think that Air Force is 0-for-Carney against Navy after he had the nerve to tell Navy coaches and players on his Annapolis recruiting trip that he was choosing Air Force because he didn’t think that Navy could beat them. When I was at USNA, the team that my football player friends said had talked the most trash was Air Force by far. Shoot, even their friggin’ Drum and Bugle Corps threw such a tantrum one year after losing to Navy that they actually tossed their 2nd place trophy into the Chesapeake (the best part of that story is that members of the Coast Guard D&B, in true Coast Guard fashion, dove in and recovered the trophy). While Army and Navy seem to embrace their common bond (even if it’s strained occasionally), Air Force from day one chose to eschew that in favor of the typical “hate” rivalries in college football. Oh, Air Force fans will act offended at that idea and say things like “we wear a uniform too,” but that’s just a show. When push comes to shove and their coach tries to run up the score against Navy to “send a message,” the uniform doesn’t seem to matter much to them anymore. When that same coach publicly ridicules both Army and Navy on media day by talking about their “new way to count to ten: 0-1, 0-2, 0-3…”, well that’s just fine with them. Some Air Force fans think that anything that comes out of the school is “classy” no matter what, simply because they’re Air Force. It doesn’t work that way. This all sounds more like Steve Spurrier vs. Phil Fulmer than Army vs. Navy. If that’s the type of rivalry they wanted, they certainly succeded in getting it.

I tell you these things not because I want to turn this post into an Air Force hate-fest, but rather in the interest of full disclosure. I’m an opinionated guy and I obviously talk about things from a Navy point of view, but I still try to maintain some level of objectivity when looking at each game from week to week. Air Force fans won’t believe it, but it is in fact possible to take an objective look at something and reach the conclusion that Air Force might not be perfect. Of course, I’m not a zoomiphile. Therefore, if I write something that isn’t in line with Air Force being the greatest team ever, you can feel free to dismiss it as the biased clack of a zoomie hater. My feelings won’t be hurt if you think so. 

Anyway, on to the game. 

First, the unavoidable, glaring reality: Air Force is 3-1.

Their supposedly revamped offense is 114th in the nation in passing, 98th in scoring, and 80th overall. Shaun Carney, who fans and media hailed for his passing efficiency the last two years, is 87th in that category so far this year with three INTs and only two TDs. The Falcon offensive line gives up one sack for every 10 passing attempts.

But Air Force is 3-1.

Air Force has defeated a MEAC team, a Utah squad without its two best offensive players, and a TCU team that not only gave the Air Force game away, but could only manage 7 offensive points the following week against an SMU team ranked 108th in total defense.

Yeah, but Air Force is 3-1.

Troy Calhoun is a rookie head coach. Their offensive coordinator left for Arkansas just a few weeks before the season began. The coaching staff is one of the youngest in the country and includes the defensive coordinator of Navy’s 1-win 2000 team.

Nevertheless, Air Force is 3-1.

It boggles the mind, given all the reasons why they should be worse. I’ll be the first to admit that I thought Air Force would be 1-3 at this point. Maybe they got lucky. Maybe (ok, definitely) Utah and TCU were very overrated. Or maybe their players just find a way to win. At the end of the day, does it matter? Not as long as they get the W, and Air Force is now halfway to bowl eligibility. Navy’s job on Saturday is to ensure that Air Force’s status in that regard doesn’t change for at least another week.

Obviously, it’s a big game. The first goal of the Navy football program each year is to win the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy. It’s the closest thing to a conference championship that we have (and hopefully ever will have). The three service academies are the most unique schools in Division I. While every game is important, the games against Army and Air Force are the only real apples to apples comparisons on the schedule. These are the schools we measure ourselves against.

Paul Johnson knows what this game means. “It’s a big game. There is no sense in ducking that. It’s a big game.”

Adam Ballard knows what this game means. “I’d rather get hit with a baseball bat repeatedly than lose that trophy to Air Force.”

The PrizeYet the enthusiasm doesn’t seem to be shared on the other side. Air Force coaches and players are going out of their way to talk about how the Navy game isn’t as important to them as it used to be. According to Chad Hall, “Navy’s just another team on our schedule.” That appears to be the approved talking point for Air Force players this week, as Shaun Carney sounds pretty much the same. “When it comes down to it, it means a lot to the seniors to try to get an opportunity to go to Washington,” he told the Colorado Springs Gazette. “And other than that, it’s just a game on the schedule.” Even if someone says that it is in fact a big game, the comment is quickly followed with another about how important winning the Mountain West and getting to a bowl game are, too. The CIC Trophy has to be put into perspective, after all.

What a letdown. Fisher DeBerry was much more entertaining, with his fake Heisman campaigns, backhanded compliments, ring fetish, and rambling about his “lost dog.” It’s almost sad to see Air Force players de-emphasize the CIC Trophy so much, even if it’s probably only an act. It’s ironic too, considering that the trophy itself was an Air Force creation meant to integrate USAFA into the spirit of the Army-Navy rivalry. So much for that idea. If you’ve ever wondered why the Air Force game will never be anything like Army-Navy, their players are telling you all you need to know.

Regardless of Team Jesus Christ’s priorities, there’s an interesting game shaping up. Not only strength vs. strength, but weakness vs. weakness. We shall begin with the latter, that being the Air Force offense vs. the Navy defense.

There was a lot of speculation about what the Air Force offense would look like under Troy Calhoun. When he first took the reins of the Air Force program from Fisher DeBerry, Calhoun had a very different vision for how the offense should look. The offense would rely less on the option and instead feature a tailback who would get 20 or so carries per game. Calhoun also wanted to have more of a run-pass balance, presumably to take advantage of Shaun Carney’s accuracy. As time went on and Calhoun became more familiar with his players, he seemed to back away from that vision and favor the option a bit more. According to Paul Johnson, what he’s seeing on film is not much of a departure from what Air Force did last year. “It’s still the same kids. They are doing a lot of the same stuff,” he told Bill Wagner on Monday. “It isn’t a radical change; they are just doing it from different formations.”

Maybe not a radical change, but whatever changes they did make haven’t really worked. Air Force is still ranked in the bottom 5 in I-A in passing. That’s nothing new. What is new is that unlike years past, they aren’t ranked in the top 10 in rushing. The Air Force offense of old was always good for 250-280 rushing yards per game. So far this year, they’re averaging 223. I suppose that you can achieve “balance” by just driving rushing production down to be as low as your passing numbers, but I don’t think that’s what Troy Calhoun had in mind. Ironically, Air Force’s best offensive showing this year came against Utah, where the offense lined up the same way they did for the last 20 years and ran for 330+ yards.

The problem isn’t necessarily one of scheme. The Air Force offense just hasn’t executed very well. On the somewhat rare occasion when they did execute, their coaches had them in position to make a play. Air Force’s offense was absolutely horrible against TCU, but two huge plays in the 4th quarter resurrected them. They obviously have some big-play ability. What they’ve been lacking is the ability to make those plays with any kind of consistency, especially through the air.

Air Force’s passing problems have caught a few people by surprise. Many people regarded Shaun Carney very highly as a passer and thought that the new offense would take better advantage of his throwing ability. But why did so many think that Carney was so good? His rise through the Air Force record book is one reason, although it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that a quarterback who started for four years would have accumulated higher career numbers than most. The other reason was because of his pass efficiency rating. In 2006, Shaun Carney had a pass efficiency rating of 157.5, which would have been good for 11th in the country if he was eligible (Carney didn’t have the minimum of 15 attempts per game). In the new offense, that rating has plunged to 111.8. And that’s where statistics can lead you astray; sometimes they tell you more about what you’re doing than how well you’re doing it. This is the case with Carney. Pass effieciency is all about bang for the buck. In an option offense, a good portion of the passing is done with play-action to catch defenses sleeping, leading to wide-open receivers running for daylight. These passes are completed for big gains, and often touchdowns. That’s what drives the pass efficiency numbers. It’s no different with Navy’s offense. In 2005, Lamar Owens’ 144.2 rating would have been good enough to rank him in the top 20 in that category. I don’t think anybody would have considered him a top passer that year, though. Lamar was simply good enough to do what his particular offense asked him to do. The same can be said of Carney, only now he’s being asked to do something different. Passing is a lot harder when defenses are expecting it.

Air Force might be struggling on offense, but they aren’t exactly taking on the Monsters of the Midway this week. As you are well aware by now, Navy’s defense has had problems of its own. Some people take comfort in knowing that the Air Force offense isn’t nearly as big as the offenses that Navy has faced this year. I am not one of those people. While it’s true that Navy has faced some big teams this year, physical differences aren’t the source of Navy’s problems. Navy’s problems come from a lack of discipline and experience. You don’t have to be 320 pounds to move a defensive lineman out of the way if that DL is running the wrong way to begin with. Schematically, Air Force naturally employs a lot of fakes, misdirection, and play-action. Those things, plus the occasional trick play, will mean big trouble for a defense that plays as sloppily as Navy has this year. Air Force will have open plays. The question is whether or not they can execute them.

For all of the talk about Air Force’s offense, the biggest surprise has actually been their defense– but for the opposite reason. Air Force is giving up a respectable 333 yards per game, including less than 100 per game on the ground. They are ranked in the top 20 in scoring defense. Now it’s true that they’ve faced a few struggling offenses, but it isn’t like Duke was lighting up anyone’s scoreboard before they played Navy. Air Force’s defense is playing good football, and they’re doing it using an attacking style that many people (including myself) thought would leave them exposed to the big play. It hasn’t really happened yet, thanks in large part to a veteran linebacking corps led by Drew Fowler and John Rabold. Air Force already has 9 sacks this year and gives up less than three yards per carry.

With the pressure that Air Force is sure to bring to the line of scrimmage to stop the option, Kaipo could have to replicate his passing performance from last week. It’s kind of funny that Kaipo’s 217 yards passing last week in Paul Johnson’s “one-dimensional” offense is more than any game that Shaun Carney has had this year in his new “balanced” offense. Chances are that Air Force defensive coordinator Tim DeRuyter is going to make him have to prove that it wasn’t a fluke. Or maybe it’s more accurate that DeRuyter is going to make the offensive line prove that it wasn’t a fluke. Either way, the pressure is coming. Navy’s offensive fate rests on the team’s ability to handle it and Paul Johnson’s ability to adjust to it. The latter is a no-brainer. I feel a little bit better about the former after watching the offense last week.

Shaun Carney went to the Air Force Academy because he said that Navy would never beat them. Since then, Navy has never lost to them. Carney has one more chance to do what he went to Air Force to do. For Navy, it’s time to finish karma’s job.

Navy Outlasts Duke

Hands on hips. That’s always the sign that the defense is tired; between plays, the players put their hands on their hips. Two plays before Bobby Doyle tapped into his quarterback experience and delivered a perfect pass to Jarod Bryant for the game-tying touchdown, CSTV cameras panned over the Duke defense. Almost all of the Blue Devil defenders were standing with their hands on their hips. They were exhausted.

The hot Annapolis afternoon took its toll on players from both teams. The difference in the game was that Navy had the depth to replace players who were worn out by the heat. Bobby Doyle stepped in late in place of the injured Shun White and picked up a key first down before he threw the TD pass. Joey Bullen is the hero after booming two field goals and two deep kickoffs in place of Matt Harmon. Eric Kettani and Adam Ballard were a tag-team at fullback. The offensive and defensive lines were rotating guys through like it was grade-school volleyball. And then, of course, there was the jolt the offense received when Jarod Bryant came into the game to replace the “gassed” Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada.

Last week I wrote that Navy coaches were expecting Duke to come out and try to run the ball. The Duke coaching staff didn’t get the memo. Navy got almost no pressure on the quarterback, and as a result Thaddeus Lewis had a career day passing the ball, throwing for 428 yards and four touchdowns. All four of those touchdowns and more than half of those yards went to wide receiver Eron Riley, who averaged almost 40 yards per catch. Navy had no answer for the Duke passing game.

There’s a lot to go over, so let’s get started.

The defense stinks.

I don’t know what to say, so I will put this in pictures. Here is my pictoral essay on things that are more stout than the Navy defense:

Ok, ok, before I pile onto the defense too much, they deserve a lot of credit. On a day when players were dropping like flies, they fought hard through the whole game. In fact, their biggest plays– Nate Frazier’s sack, Tony Haberer’s fumble recovery, and Ketric Buffin’s interception– all came in the second half. “I think the biggest thing that sticks out in my mind about this game is that our kids didn’t quit,” PJ said in his postgame press conference. “They fought from start to finish and they kept playing. If you’ll do that, you’re going to always have a chance. You may not always win, but you’ll always have a chance if you keep fighting.”

The guys are playing hard. Now they need to play smart. To me, there’s one play you will all remember that perfectly illustrates the problem. In the third quarter, Duke got the ball in Navy territory after Navy couldn’t convert on a fake punt. They picked up a first down and moved the ball to the Navy 32 yard line. Then, a glorious thing happened; Nate Frazier stunted around from his NG position and sacked Thaddeus Lewis. On the next play, Lewis fumbled the snap, resulting in a 3rd and 20 for Duke. They only picked up 10 on the next play, leading to 4th and 10 from the Navy 32. Since they’re in that middle ground where they’re too close to punt but too far for a field goal, Duke goes for the first down. On that 4th down play, Lewis takes the snap in the shotgun. Kyle Bookhout is playing left DE and starts his rush outside. Not being able to get by the tackle, he spins inside and runs straight into a double-team. Meanwhile, now that the DE has spun inside, there’s nobody left with containment on the outside. Lewis sees this and cruises for an 11 yard run and a first down. That’s just a lack of discipline, and things like that are happening on every play. How many times does the defense bite on a fake, or get horribly out of position on a misdirection play? Again, the defense is playing hard. To play hard, though, does not mean to play recklessly.

The philosophy behind the Navy defense is to keep everything in front of them, but it seemed like more plays went over their heads in the Duke game than in the last two years combined. This is the third straight game where the defense has given up 475+ yards. It was a great win on Saturday, but things won’t always work out so well if the defense keeps this up. The first leg of the CIC Trophy round-robin is this week, so they better figure it out soon.

The offense does not stink.

In 2003 when Navy lost to Delaware, Blue Hens coach K.C. Keeler made it obvious in his halftime interview that he didn’t care about the Navy passing game. He was going to take all 11 guys he had on defense and bring them crashing down to stop the option. If the ball got thrown over their heads, too bad. Well, it did get thrown over their head once, as Craig Candeto hit a wide-open Eric Roberts for a long TD pass in the first quarter. Keeler didn’t care. He had decided that Navy would have to beat him through the air, and Navy couldn’t do it. Delaware walked out of there with a 21-17 win.

Duke took the same approach on Saturday. This year, though, Navy got the job done through the air. Navy’s 236 yards passing forced Duke to back off, which opened up some running room. The toss sweep worked a little better in the second half, with Reggie Campbell and Bobby Doyle combining to average 11 yards per carry. After a rough start for the offensive line, they were able to get enough push for the two fullbacks to combine for 100 yards. The two quarterbacks also combined to top 100 rushing yards. The offense limited the mental errors, with Kaipo’s interception being the only real screwup.

On the subject of quarterbacks…

Ok, everybody’s in love with Jarod Bryant right now. In fact, in the third quarter when Kaipo threw an incomplete pass to Reggie Campbell on a wheel route, a group of jerk Mids could clearly be heard starting a “Jarod Bryant” chant. Nice bilge, fellas.

Everyone needs to take a step back and look at the big picture. Jarod Bryant is succeeding because PJ is putting him into situations where he can succeed. He was the right player at the right time because his fresh legs made him nearly impossible to tackle to fading Duke defenders. “Jarod played really well, but also I think that in a game like that where everybody was tired– I mean our guys were tired too– and you put in a guy who’s fresh, all of a sudden he’s a lot quicker and a lot faster than everybody else,” remarked PJ. “We’ve got a lot of confidence in him. Coach Jasper and I talked about it. We felt like Kaipo was kind of winded. He had done nothing wrong. Gosh, he had moved the offense up and down the field and played well, but I thought Jarod might give us a little boost. We needed a little kick and he kind of gave us one.” Don’t underestimate the impact that a fresh-legged player can have late in the game. Jarod was the right player at the right time. That doesn’t mean that it’s time to make a switch.

Do those of you who want to bench Kaipo have any idea of how much of a juggernaut our offense is right now? We’re #1 in the country in rushing offense. We’re also #22 in total offense. Ahead of USC. Ahead of LSU. Ahead of Texas. Navy fans have talked for years about whether the offense of PJ’s Hawaii days would ever make an appearance in Annapolis. On Saturday, it did. Why on earth would anyone want to mess with that? The Navy offense is working. In this offense, no matter what you think you’ve seen, that means that the quarterback is working. Navy fans have also taken it as gospel that Bryant is the better passer between the two quarterbacks; after Saturday, I don’t think that’s a given.

Haven’t we learned anything by now? In 2002, Aaron Polanco stepped in for Craig Candeto against Boston College in the second half and moved the ball pretty well. People started to wonder if Polanco should start. Craig got hurt in the first series against Notre Dame, and Aaron did a good job filling in the rest of the game. With Craig out, the people who wanted Aaron to start got their wish the next week against UConn. That game ended up being probably the worst offensive performance in the history of Navy football. Not that it was all Aaron’s fault, but he obviously wasn’t the panacea that some people were making him out to be. Craig came back, led the offense to a good game against a bowl-bound Wake Forest team, then scrambled the record book against Army. The rest is history.

In 2004, people were wondering how the offense would be able to carry on without Candeto. Polanco proceeded to lead the team to its best season in 40 years.

In 2005, Lamar Owens got off to a rough start. He had to leave the Maryland game because of cramps. He was also having a tough time passing the ball. People started to question his heart. They went so far as hyperanalyzing his body language on the sideline and calling out his leadership ability. After a decent relief appearance against Stanford, these people called for junior Brian Hampton to start, saying that we would be better off having a two-year starter. Meanwhile, Lamar came back to lead Navy to an 8-2 record the rest of the way, including rolling up 51 points against Colorado State in the Poinsettia Bowl.

In 2006, Brian Hampton got off to a rough start against ECU. He missed a bunch of open receivers and had some of his pitches batted down. In week 2 against Massachussetts, the offense turned the ball over 6 times and the team barely squeaked out a 1-point win. People again started to panic and called for a quarterback change. The next week, Hampton led Navy to a 37-9 rout of Stanford, and all was well again…

…that is, until Hampton went down to injury against Rutgers. Kaipo came into the game and got crushed. Jarod Bryant came into the game after Kaipo and also got crushed, only some people seemed to think that he got crushed a little less. So when Kaipo was named the starter for the Notre Dame game the next week, people were already calling for Bryant instead. Kaipo played pretty well against Notre Dame, though, and went on to lead the team to wins in four of the last five games.

Maybe we should have figured this out by now.

I have read some calm and well-reasoned arguments as to why Jarod Bryant should start. I have also read everything from the ridiculous to the downright shameful. There is no reason why anyone should be questioning Kaipo’s heart simply because he ran out of steam on a sweltering afternoon. In case you didn’t notice, a lot of players came out of that game. As I said at the beginning of this rambling post, it was a game decided by more subs than just at quarterback. Maybe when you’ve played your ass off for three quarters on an afternoon like that, you can start questioning any of these kids’ dedication. Until then, you’d be better served keeping your mouth shut. You know who you are.

In the 1996 Aloha Bowl, Ben Fay came into the game in the 4th quarter in relief of an exhausted Chris McCoy. Fay provided the fresh legs that Navy needed to pull out a victory after a late Cal turnover. Sound familiar? Does anyone think that the ’96 team would have been better off if Fay had started all year? Now it’s 2007, and as the philosopher Robert Plant once said, the song remains the same. In the midst of all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that’s going on with fans, Navy’s offense is shaping up to be the best that we’ve had under Paul Johnson. Two straight games with 500+ yards of offense; some saying about fixing things that aren’t broken comes to mind.

We have two quarterbacks that the coaching staff has confidence in. In these marathon games, we know that we can have fresh legs on tap at the end. Embrace what we have. Don’t mess with success.

Birddog Game Balls

— Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada: Kaipo was 11-16 passing for 217 yards. With the success that Duke was having selling out against the option, only Kaipo’s arm kept Navy in the game in the first half. Now that Air Johnson is on film, everyone’s going to have to respect our ability to pass the rest of the year.

— Jarod Bryant: Jarod needs to submit a no-shave chit. Every good closer needs facial hair at some point. Or maybe we can play Hell’s Bells on the PA when he comes into the game. That is, if Chuck Atwater doesn’t mind. Jarod’s QB draw to start the game-winning drive was killer. It looked like old NFL Films highlights of Jim Brown running in the open field.

— Blake Carter: So who here plays Madden or NCAA Football on the Playstation or Xbox? You know what a “money play” is? That play you know you can pull out in a long-yardage situation to get a first down because the computer never stops it? Everyone has one or two go-to plays like that. On Saturday, Duke did too: that swing pass/bubble screen to the WR in the flat. It was good for 15 yards every time. That is, until Blake Carter entered the game. He blew up that play at least twice in the second half and pretty much single-handedly took it away from Duke. That made a HUGE difference.

— Joey Bullen: Duh.

Game Week: Duke

6’8″, 310
6’5″, 285
6’4″, 285
6’6″, 290
6’6″, 280

Those are the heights and weights of the Duke offensive line. While they might not be the biggest in the country, they’re still big; plenty big enough to be a problem for the Navy defense. But that’s the story every week, isn’t it? Ten of the twelve teams on Navy’s schedule are virtually guaranteed to be bigger than the Mids each year, and even Army and Air Force have outweighed the Mids up front the last couple of years. Heck, Duke was bigger than Navy last year when Navy rushed for 435 yards and held Duke to only 113. Well, that was last year. Overcoming weight disadvantages with last year’s players is no guarantee that it will happen again with this year’s. Indeed, through three games, it hasn’t.

There are a lot of things that an offense can do schematically to overcome a size disadvantage. Navy’s A-backs are smaller than the average Division I-A running back, but they very rarely have to run between the tackles. In Paul Johnson’s offense, they get the ball in space to take advantage of their speed. Navy’s offensive linemen are also generally smaller than their counterparts on other teams. The Navy offense doesn’t ask the same things from its linemen, though. Rather than engage defensive linemen one on one, larger defensive tackles are frequently double-teamed while a defensive end goes unblocked as the quarterback’s give key. Most schools like tall offensive linemen, particularly tackles, because they can take bigger backward strides in pass protection to counter the speed of defensive ends and linebackers. At Navy, shorter offensive linemen are better suited for the cut-blocking that the triple option requires.

On the other side of the ball, though, there isn’t much you can do. If an offense wants to run the ball down your throat, there isn’t a scheme that will make up for a 235 lb. DE taking on a 310 lb. tackle. There are only so many ways a defense can line up. Since no scheme will solve this, the only way to limit the damage is through individual effort and sound fundamentals. Therein lies the problem.

As I have posted in earlier entries, effort and fundamentals haven’t exactly been the calling cards of the Navy defense this year. Well, fundamentals anyway. From what my untrained eye could tell, the effort level was better against Ball State than it was against Rutgers. At the very least, Coach Johnson hasn’t complained about effort in his press briefings so far this week. Fundamentals, on the other hand, are still being widely discussed. As was pointed out after the Ball State game, the defense has problems lining up correctly. All the effort in the world can’t make up for missed assignments. Missed assignments also compound the size disadvantage. Even if you’re getting pushed around, if you’re minding your gaps you’ll be in a position to make a tackle. It might be three yards downfield, but you’ll be there. When you line up incorrectly, not only will nobody be in the right spot to make the tackle, but the hole that the running back will have to run through will be huge. In a 3-4 defense, the linebackers are the playmakers. The defensive line’s job is to absorb blocks, leaving linebackers free to move from sideline to sideline. When you line up incorrectly, it leaves offensive linemen free to put a block on a linebacker who otherwise could have made a play.

After watching film of Ball State nearly doubling their season rushing total against Navy, first-year Duke offensive coordinator Peter Vaas has to be excited. Navy seems to be the cure for what ails opposing running games. Ball State was no rushing juggernaut coming into the Navy game, but 262 yards later their running game was back on track. The Duke coaching staff has to see this game as an opportunity to jumpstart their own ground game, which is in far worse shape than Ball State’s. Duke’s leading rusher, Justin Boyle, averages less than three yards per carry and has only 66 yards through 3 games. Their second-leading rusher, fullback (and Army transfer) Tielor Robinson, averages a more respectable 3.7 yards per carry. Unfortunately for the Blue Devils, he’s also out for the year. The Navy game is an opportunity for the Duke offense to gain some momentum and confidence in running the ball going into the meat of their ACC schedule.

At least, that’s what Paul Johnson is expecting from Duke on Saturday. Quarterback Thaddeus Lewis is developing into a really good player for the Blue Devils, but that isn’t the coach’s focus this week. “I hope we can limit them running the ball. For us to be successful we have to limit the rushing yards,” he said on Tuesday. “If they come in and pass for what they are passing for we can live with that. We have to limit the rushing yards.”

In other words, Navy’s defense can’t have a repeat of the Ball State game.

Since Navy coaches expect that Duke will have a similar offensive gameplan to Ball State, how do they prevent a similar result? The word of the week at practice has been “simplification.” What exactly does that entail? According to Sandra McKee this morning, Buddy Green has cut the number of defensive plays in half in order to give his young defense fewer assignments to remember. It seems to be working. If the defense is as athletic as Coach Johnson said at the beginning of the year, then just getting lined up correctly should be enough to allow them to make a few plays. Of course, having fewer plays in the defensive gameplan means that the Duke offense has fewer things to think about, but it’s probably best to deal with that issue when we come to it. It isn’t like the defense can get that much worse at this point.

TauiliiliLike Navy, Duke has a bit of a rebuilding effort this year on defense with only two seniors expected to start. Unlike Navy, some leaders have emerged on that defense. Michael Tauiliili is no surprise. Duke’s leading tackler the last two seasons, Tauiliili has picked up right where he left off. After missing Duke’s opener against Connecticut due to suspension, the junior middle linebacker returned to force turnovers in each of the last two games, including an interception on the second play of Duke’s win over Northwestern. Tauiliili was just as rangy against Navy last year, registering 13 tackles. While his performance is no surprise, Vincent Rey’s is. A sophomore who lines up at weakside linebacker, Rey is third in the ACC in tackles. He had 17 against Connecticut alone. Rey had 11 last week against Northwestern to go along with 4 pass breakups and two tackles for a loss, earning him ACC Player of the Week honors. Patrick Bailey plays a hybrid DE/LB position and is also in the ACC’s top 10 in tackles. With the emergence of Rey and the consistency of Tauiliili added on to the talent of preseason Lindy’s and Athlon All-ACC pick Vince Oghobaase, Duke has a better defense than people think.

Last year, the Duke game was where Navy fans got their first real look at Kaipo’s potential. He had is first career 100-yard rushing game and threw his first career touchdown pass while leading the offense to 435 rushing yards and 38 points. With that performance, chances are that Duke will line up differently this year. No matter how they line up, the key matchup will be Antron Harper against the 6’6″, 310-lb. Oghobaase. Antron hasn’t been 100% healthy yet this year, and he’s going to need everything his injured ankles can give him to move that mountain of a DT. The fullbacks also had a big game against Duke in 2006, with Adam Ballard running for 104 yards. Now that the offense finally established the FB last week, I don’t think they want to lose that momentum.

The importance of this game can’t be overstated. The confidence gained or lost from winning or losing will have a huge impact in the first leg of the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy battle next week. Win, and Navy is back on track. Lose, and you’re 1-3 with doubt creeping in and a likely 3-1 Air Force team coming to town. We hear Paul Johnson say all the time that the most important game of the season is the next one. This week, that couldn’t be more true.

Extra points:

— Navy better have solved its kicking issues after last week. Duke has already blocked three kicks this season: an extra point against UConn plus a punt and a field goal at Virginia (the latter coming from, once again, Vincent Rey). Duke’s special teams superlatives extend to kickoffs, where Jabari Marshall leads the ACC in return average at 28.5 yards (including a 94-yard TD vs. UConn). Duke kickoff coverage is #1 in the nation, allowing only 14.36 yards per return. Navy has also done well on kick coverage so far, ranking 8th nationally at 16.23 yards per return.

— And you thought Juicy Juice was bad… At some point during the game, you just know that Duke NG Ayanga Okpokowuruk will tackle Navy QB Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada. Thoughts and prayers go out to Bob Socci, Pete Medhurst, and their families.

Your Cup Runneth Over

Your blog choices are expanding pretty much by the minute. If you’re a Navy fan, you know Pete Medhurst. He is the Voice of Navy Lacrosse, the television voice of Navy football for CSTV, host of Navy’s CSTV All-Access, and the co-host of the Navy football Tailgate Show before each game. He knows what he’s talking about, whether it’s Navy sports or the sporting world in general. He’s as entertaining as he is enlightening, and now he’s blogging. Bookmark this: http://peteonsports.blogspot.com/. Try not to forget about me.

EDIT: Man, is this great timing or what?

Navy Is Not a Good Football Team

Ladies and gentlemen, this is reality. Navy is not good. It might hurt to say it, but it’s hard to reach any other conclusion objectively. Could Navy be good eventually? Maybe, but right now the team has a host of problems. How can a team that rushed for almost 1/3 of a mile and scored 31 points still lose a football game? Through fumbles, special teams miscues, and a defense about as stout as the Maginot Line.

Once again, I’m going to talk to myself:

OK, so tell me about these problems.

The offense produced against Ball State. They had 521 yards rushing, scored 31 points, only had to punt once, and averaged eight yards per play. As productive as they were, though, they still weren’t flawless. Shun White fumbled a perfect pitch in the third quarter when he was looking upfield instead of at the ball. Jarod Bryant’s overtime fumble washed out his commendable second-half performance in relief of an injured Kaipo.

Bryant’s fumble was disastrous, but the game should never have reached that point. With two seconds left in the game, Matt Harmon put what should have been a chip shot, game winning field goal on a trajectory so low that his own linemen probably could have blocked it just by standing at attention. That was Harmon’s second blocked field goal of the game. Kicking a field goal is about as basic as it gets in football. Making the same mistake twice in one game is inexcusable.

Both of those problems are bad, but likely correctable. The offense needs some up-downs during practice to remind them to keep their heads in the game, and we might see a new kicker. The defense’s problems, though, run a lot deeper.  

I don’t know where to begin. I guess we’ll start with the big picture: Ball State had a ridiculous 539 yards of total offense. The Cardinals had a total of 293 rushing yards for the season coming into the game; against Navy, they nearly doubled that with 262. They converted 11 of 15 third downs. Once again, Navy did not record a sack, and still has only one through 3 games. Ketric Buffin and Darius Terry managed to make a couple of plays, but for the most part the front seven was silent.

The defense’s struggles put the offense in a bad position. In order for Navy to win, the offense now has to be perfect. Every time the offense doesn’t score, it could potentially cost the team the game. Every mistake the offense makes is amplified because the defense isn’t able to make a play of its own. Nobody, especially Navy, is going to have a successful season if they go into every game with the mindset of “last team with the ball wins.”

In his blog, Bill Wagner tells us that during a phone conversation he had with PJ (showoff), a little light has been shed on some of the defense’s issues.

“We need to simplify some stuff,” Johnson said. “We’re not getting lined up properly and we don’t understand what we’re supposed to do.”

Johnson said some coach-speak, technical mumbo jumbo about the Navy defense being in a “five technique when we were supposed to be in a down nine technique.” I have no idea what that means, other than the fact Navy’s defense was not in the formation it should have been based on the way Ball State lined up.

I have a feeling that Wagner does indeed know what this means, but feels that the details would just weigh down his post. I have no such discretion. PJ is referring to how the defensive line and down linebackers are supposed to line up across from the offensive line. These assignments are the fundamentals of pass rushing and gap control in the running game. For example, in the five technique that PJ is talking about, the lineman/LB is lined up on the outside eye of the tackle. His responsibility would be the C gap, between the tackle and tight end. In the nine technique, the lineman/LB is lined up on the outside eye of the tight end and is responsible for outside containment. Now, multiply missed assignments like this by each down lineman or LB and it’s obvious how there can be such wide running lanes for opposing RBs, and why opposing offensive lines have no problem handling our pass rush. Again, from Wagner:

Johnson said the film showed instances on Saturday when Navy left the area within five yards of the line of scrimmage (known as the box) completely wide open due to linemen slanting the wrong way and linebackers either getting blocked or running themselves out of the play.

It also makes it easy to understand what PJ meant earlier when he said that the defense was playing “street ball;” they’re just lining up wherever and trying to bull rush the OL rather than minding their assigned technique.

So tell the coaches to fix it! I’m so smart.

Well, it isn’t that easy. This isn’t one of those things that coaches can micromanage during a game. The coaches are teaching these things in practice, but during a game it’s the players’ responsibility to know where to line up when the defense is called. That’s why losing Sovie was so huge; lining everyone up correctly was his job. Nobody else has shown the ability to do that yet. You could say that the defense is young, and that’s true. But if the team is content with that, then it’s going to be a long year. That’s why PJ wants to, as he puts it, “simplify” the defense. If the players don’t know where they’re supposed to line up, then it’s time to call plays where they will. That’s apparently what PJ and Buddy have in store for practice this week.

Should I start talking quarterback controversy?

No. Jarod Bryant did step in and play well, with the obvious and catastrophic exception being the overtime fumble. He seemed to miss a couple of reads, but nothing out of the ordinary for the third game of the season. Bryant also had the benefit of PJ’s halftime adjustments. The offense moved the ball well in the second half, but it wasn’t Jarod Bryant that opened up the toss sweep or changed the blocking scheme to give the fullback room to rumble. That was PJ. Bryant managed the offense effectively, but the quarterback wasn’t the only change that was made in the second half.

Don’t forget that Kaipo was on his way to a career day before he got hurt, with 117 yards and two TDs in one half. The bulk of those yards came on a beautiful 80-yard TD run that showcased his deceptive speed. Before he was injured, I thought Kaipo had shown a lot of improvement in running with more strength. PJ called the midline option regularly in the first two quarters, and Kaipo gained good yards by putting his head down and fighting inside. He could get better, but he wasn’t tip-toeing anymore. He seemed to run with more authority. He wasn’t perfect; his passing was still awkward, and he took a bad sack that put us on the edge of field goal range. But he didn’t do anything to demonstrate why he shouldn’t start.

Assuming that Kaipo is healthy, he’ll start against Duke. The good thing is that we know we can be confident with either quarterback running the offense.

Should I start talking fullback controversy?

No. We knew both FBs were going to play. Ballard averaged 5 yards per carry and ran for 75 yards. He had a good day. PJ said last week, though, that if one of the fullbacks was hot, he wasn’t going to take him out. With a couple of great TD runs, Kettani was hot. I’m sure they’ll both play plenty next week.

Should I start talking kicker controversy?

Perhaps. Harmon is usually dependable, but his worm-burner FG attempts were costly. Maybe he’s changed his kicking technique to handle kicking off from the 30 instead of the 35 or something. I can’t think of any other explanation why his FGs would take such a low trajectory all of a sudden. But with proven big-game kicker Joey Bullen breathing down his neck and Kyle Delahooke turning heads in the JV game, Harmon might not have the chance to redeem himself. Don’t be surprised if Harmon handles kickoffs on Saturday, with Bullen taking the FGs. Pure conjecture on my part, of course; but what else is new?

So now what?

Well, the good news is that Wagner reports that both Kaipo and Irv Spencer should be healthy enough to play on Saturday. That’s a start, assuming they can get through a week of practice without aggravating their injuries.

All we can hope for now is that the defense will learn, and that the offense can stop making careless mistakes in order to pick up the slack until they do. Last week I told you that Ball State was a good football team, but they aren’t the 1995 Nebraska Cornhuskers. They have no business running for 262 yards against anybody. If that’s the kind of defense we’ll get all year, then we might as well start packing up the CIC Trophy, never mind a bowl bid. 

Along those lines, I hope that Navy fans understand just how special the past few seasons were. There has been a lot of talk around here of “next level” and “signature wins” and whatnot, while implying that seasons like ’03-’06 just won’t cut it for too long. I hope that everyone understands how much of a balancing act it is to succeed at USNA, and how little it takes to tip that balance.