A tale of two halves.
The first was an epic fail.
Second? Poetry.
Category: navy football
GAME WEEK: SMU
I’m so mad at June Jones right now.
This week was shaping up so nicely for me. I finished the writeup for the Rice game on Monday night instead of Tuesday, so I was already ahead of the curve. By Tuesday night I was just about done with the SMU preview, too. Everything was all laid out. I wrote all about how this year’s SMU game would be nothing like last year’s 34-7 Navy win. There was no way that there would be anything to take from that game, right? I mean, the game was played in a monsoon, with winds gusting to 36 mph. The wind kept Jones from being able to unleash his full playbook on the Mids. Bo Levi Mitchell finished with only 157 yards passing, 56 of those yards coming on one play. That wasn’t even a long pass either; it was more of a catch-and-run. Forcing the defense to cover the entire field is what makes the run and shoot work, and the wind made that impossible. With the weekend forecast for Dallas calling for clear skies and light winds, the SMU offense figures to look a lot different compared to a year ago.
Two days ago, I thought their defense would, too. Navy didn’t even attempt a pass against the Mustangs in 2008. They didn’t have to. The Mids ran for 404 yards, 224 of them coming from Ricky Dobbs. The Navy QB tacked on 4 TDs as well, and he didn’t even play the whole game; Jarod Bryant was the starter. Bryant was on his way to a monster game himself, running for 50 yards on only 6 carries before leaving the game for the second time due to injury. Ricky carried the ball 42 times, and SMU didn’t stop him. With that kind of a beating, defensive coordinator Tom Mason would be sure to scrap last year’s Navy game plan and go with something else, right? Besides, SMU switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 this year, so there isn’t any reason to even bother looking at last year’s game, is there?
Then I hopped onto the internet Wednesday morning and read this:
The Mustangs defense will adjust to a four-man front this week in preparation for Navy’s triple-option, defensive coordinator Tom Mason said.
and this:
SMU will also revert back to some of the schemes it used in last year’s 34-7 loss at Navy, with new wrinkles designed to better limit quarterback Ricky Dobbs. Dobbs ran for 224 yards and four touchdowns against the Mustangs last season.

Part of me thinks that this has to be some kind of trick. There’s no way that SMU will revert to the same defensive plan that led to last year’s thumping, is there? Apparently, that’s exactly what is going to happen, so now I have to scrap everything I already wrote and hit the DVD player. Way to kill my family time, SMU. I’m not sure this revelation is all that helpful to the Navy coaches, either, since it could easily just be an attempt to spread misinformation.
It won’t take us long to find out. The coaches weren’t really sure how SMU was going to line up going into last year’s game, either. In situations like that, it’s common for Coach Jasper to call a designed handoff to the fullback on the game’s first play. He’ll send a slotback in tail motion to make it look like the triple option, but it’s really just his way of seeing the defense’s game plan. That’s how he started the game last year, which you can see on the first play on the clip. SMU used a variation of the same free-safety-takes-the-pitch-man defense we see all the time. In this case, with the corners playing tight in man coverage, it was really a cover 1 look as opposed to a cover 3. After seeing that, Jasper started calling the triple option. The corners were in tight coverage on the wide receivers and not playing run support, so Coach Jasper let his receivers run them out of the play. The playside A-back would load from the linebacker to the safety. What that means is that he’d first look to block the first linebacker out of the count. If the LB was playing the fullback dive, he’d move on to block the safety instead. With the safety blocked, the pitch was wide open.
Now, pay special attention to that last play. The really unusual part about SMU’s defense last year was that they used their outside linebackers to match up man-to-man with the slotbacks (personnel-wise, one of them was a safety, but where he was lined up made him a de facto LB). Eventually, SMU started occasionally firing their corners in run support. When that happened, Coach Jasper changed the blocking scheme. Now, the wide receiver would block the safety, while the playside A-back would arc block the cornerback.
The man coverage on the slotbacks is why Ricky Dobbs had so many carries in last year’s game. When the playside slotback went out to make his block, the man covering him would follow right along. Of course, the LB covering the slotback was also the quarterback’s pitch key, so when he kept running outside to cover his man, he was basically giving Ricky the read to keep the ball. So Ricky did. A lot.
This coverage scheme opened up opportunities for misdirection, too. The linebacker following the tail motion resulted in a numbers advantage on the vacated side of the field. Coach Jasper used the fullback blocking the inside-out linebacker pursuit, which left a lot of space outside for Ricky to run.
Once in a while, SMU would switch from a 4-man front to a 5-man front. Whenever they did, Jarod and Ricky would audible to the midline option:
The question now is what “wrinkles” the SMU staff intends to add “to better limit quarterback Ricky Dobbs,” and how to do it without opening up other plays. I’m not sure that’s possible in this defensive scheme. Don’t be surprised if, unlike last year’s contest, Coach Jasper airs it out a bit if he once again finds himself playing against cover 1 with the safety dedicated to run support. I don’t know if June Jones and defensive coordinator Tom Mason really do intend to use the same basic defense as last year, but we should hope that they do.
It’s hard to imagine that SMU would want to imitate anything from their dreadful 1-11 campaign of 2008, especially considering how well the 2009 season has gone so far. SMU is 3-2 and off to their first 2-0 start in conference play since receiving the Death Penalty in 1987– a span of three different conference memberships (Southwest, WAC, and Conference USA). The three wins are more than they had in their last two seasons combined. It hasn’t always been pretty– the Mustangs lost to a horrible Washington State team and were outgained by Stephen F. Austin in their opener, 460-355– but when you’re coming off of back-to-back one-win seasons, pretty is the farthest thing from your mind.
As the quarterback of one of only a pair of I-A schools that feature the pure run & shoot, it’s no surprise that Bo Levi Mitchell is among the nation’s top passers, averaging nearly 300 yards per game through the air. That’s up from the 238 yards per game he averaged last year, but Mitchell isn’t really throwing that much better… He’s just throwing that much more. Like last season, he’s completing about 58% of his passes, and with 10 interceptions he’s well on his way to matching the 23 he threw in 2008. He’s completing passes at about the same rate, but he’s had more opportunities to throw, completing 25 passes per game. That’s up from a little more than 19 per game a year ago, and it’s thanks mostly to the SMU defense. The unit, led by standout linebackers Chase Kennemer and Navy transfer Pete Fleps, is definitely better this year, although I wouldn’t exactly call giving up 391 yards per game good. They do, however, lead the country in interceptions with 13, and have forced 19 turnovers overall. When you average almost 4 turnovers per game, you give your quarterback more chances to throw the ball. Mitchell’s favorite target is wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders. A 5-11, 180-pound senior, Sanders is already SMU’s all-time leader in receiving yards and TD catches, and needs just one more catch to tie the SMU career mark in receptions as well. He had 18 catches for 178 yards against Washington State, and leads all of I-A in punt return average. He is as legitimate a threat as you’ll find anywhere.
Navy is favored for a reason, but this is going to be a different game than last week. Rice was a downtrodden, defeated team. After beating perennial Conference USA contender East Carolina on Saturday, SMU has to feel like they’ve turned a corner. They are going to be confident, and the Mids are going to get their best shot.
The Gansz Trophy
Saturday’s game will be an emotional one, especially for SMU. The teams will be playing for the newly-created Gansz Trophy honoring Frank Gansz, the SMU special teams coach that passed away on April 27. Gansz was sort of the football version of this guy. A 1960 graduate of the Naval Academy, he didn’t letter, but was a member of the first team to play at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium in 1959. Upon graduation, he received a commission in the Air Force, where he served for seven years. After leaving the Air Force, Gansz spent 38 years roaming the sideline. He coached at all three service academies, was the head coach of the Kansas City Chiefs, and won a Super Bowl ring coaching special teams with the St. Louis Rams. He retired in 2001, but came out of retirement last year to coach with June Jones at SMU.
A traveling trophy series with SMU is a great idea for a lot of reasons. A regular series enhances Navy’s visibility and coverage in Texas, a key recruiting state. It’s also one less date on the schedule that Navy has to fill– a task that is becoming more difficult as the Mids are more successful. The current series ends in 2011 and resumes from 2015-2018, with additional dates in the works. Plus, if SMU improves under June Jones they way many people expect them to, this could become a marquee game on the Navy schedule, and one of the better non-BCS matchups every year.
NAVY 63, RICE 14
I doubt we’ll see any people leaving comments on Wagner’s blog this week complaining about Navy’s offense.
The Mids cranked out 537 total yards, including 471 on the ground, to dismantle the Rice Owls on Saturday, 63-14. Fourteen players carried the ball for Ivin Jasper’s offense, led by Ricky Dobbs’ 104 yards and 4 touchdowns. Reserves got most of the carries in the second half, and #2 QB Kriss Proctor made the most of his playing time with 83 yards and 3 TDs of his own. Rice remains winless, while Navy moves to 4-2 and one step closer to a return trip to Houston for the Texas Bowl.
I probably should have seen this coming. Even in 2008, when Rice was a 10-game Texas Bowl winner, their defense still couldn’t handle the triple option. Army ran for 461 yards on the Owls last year, and Army’s offense was terrible. I’m not sure if it was that game or David Bailiff’s earlier experience with Georgia Southern and Cal Poly that tipped him off, but Ken Niumatalolo knew exactly what was coming. In his radio interview with Bob Socci before the game, Coach Niumat mentioned that Rice would be looking to force the ball outside, counting on the free safety to make the stop. Hmmm… Now where have we seen this before? Coach Jasper tested this on Navy’s first play from scrimmage, faking the toss sweep and throwing deep over the middle to Marcus Curry. The safety bit on the fake just enough to allow Curry to get behind him for a 51-yard gain. After the game, Bailiff commented on his defensive plan: “Every adjustment we made, everything we did, nothing worked. We will put the film on.”
Coach, at Rice, you never end a sentence with a preposition! But when he does put the film on, he’ll see that the defense did exactly what it was designed to do. Rice safety Andrew Sendejo had 17 tackles, more than twice as many as the next closest Owl. Rice switched between odd and even fronts, but the one constant was Sendejo following the tail motion and making a beeline for the pitch:
You can see in the clip how the tackle tried to make the block, but couldn’t. Over the course of the game, Coach Jasper went after the safety in a few ways. In the tight formation, he used the playside wide receiver to block the safety. This left the cornerback unblocked, but he was lined up so deep in the cover 3 that he couldn’t make the tackle until the ball carrier was already nine yards downfield. Next, he continued to use the tackle to block the safety, but instead of releasing inside of the quarterback’s read key, he had him release outside in order to give him a clearer path to his assignment. It worked well enough. Finally, he had the slotback take the safety, and Mike Stukel laid a textbook cut that carved a path for Ricky to get to the end zone.
Coach Jasper did other things too. There was the pass to open the game, of course. The counter option had some success as well. He also tinkered with the trips formation. Take a look at this next clip. In the first play, the tackle releases inside and isn’t able to get to the next level of the defense. The playside linebacker and safety are both unblocked; one takes the quarterback, the other takes the pitch, and the play is blown up. The second play is the same, only this time the safety is blocked by the wide receiver. The tackle arc blocks the cornerback, and Bobby Doyle runs for a first down:
Despite the considerable output, it was hardly a flawless performance by the offense. There were missed blocks, mixed assignments, and missed reads, although they still turned into 2-3 yard gains against the Rice defense. On the flip side, there were also some immediate improvements in the wake of the Air Force game. In the next clip, you’ll see Ricky make a tough– and correct– read against a mesh charge. You’ll also see Vince Murray make two great runs. In the first, Murray makes a nifty move to take advantage of his blockers and find some open field. The second play is a designed handoff to the fullback. Instead of trying to plow through an unblocked linebacker, Vince runs around him. Against Air Force, that play is a 2-yard gain. This week, it’s a touchdown.
Perhaps an Air Force linebacker makes that play. Still, you have to appreciate the progress.
The pyroclastic flow of offensive destruction is the most eye-popping item from the Rice game, but don’t let it overshadow another excellent performance by the Navy defense. The Mids are 29th in the country against the run after holding Rice to 21 rushing yards. Of course, 2009 Rice isn’t exactly 2004 Rice when it comes to running the ball, but after performances against Ohio State, Pitt, and Air Force, it’s clear that this ranking is no fluke. Naturally, Navy’s remaining schedule features four of the country’s top 16 passing offenses. Figures. Fortunately, the Mids got a good tune-up for these games on Saturday from a pass-happy Rice team and their sophomore quarterback.
Rice has high hopes for quarterback Nick Fanuzzi. The transfer from Alabama appeared to be turning a corner when, earlier this year, Rice actually outgained Oklahoma State in a 41-24 loss. A shoulder injury forced him to miss the last two games, but he was back in action against Navy. Fanuzzi finished with 242 yards passing and 2 TDs, including a pretty incredible toss to Patrick Randolph at the end of the first half. But the Mids were able to pick off two of Fanuzzi’s passes, and neither of Rice’s drives that started in Navy territory resulted in a score.
Fanuzzi could have blamed those fizzled drives on being rusty after being hurt for two weeks, and I don’t think anyone would have blamed him. To his credit, he didn’t:
“I felt great after this week of practice. I was confident with what I could do with my arm. I’m not putting how I played based on my shoulder hurting, that’s not the case today. I think we just had missed opportunities and we’ve just got to fix them and look forward to next week. I felt prepared, I thought we were ready to go out and play Navy this week, but I give them all the credit. They played a great game offensively and defensively. We’ve just to keep grinding.”
One of Fanuzzi’s two interceptions went to Ram Vela, who had a stellar game. On top of the interception, Ram also led the team with 5 tackles, two of which were made behind the line of scrimmage. Kevin Edwards grabbed the other interception and broke up another pass. Perhaps the most impressive performance of the day came from Michael Walsh, who filled in at nose guard while Jordan Stephens, Chase Burge, and Shane Bothel were out with injuries. Walsh usually plays defensive end, and at 251 pounds, is a bit undersized when compared to other nose guards. Someone forgot to tell him that on Saturday. Walsh consistently drew double-teams, but was still able to push himself into the backfield and even knocked down a pass. Rice’s sophomore linemen had their hands full– sometimes literally– with the Navy senior. Like the offense, Buddy Green was able to rotate in several reserves, with players like John Angelo, Max Blue, and Mason Graham making plays in the second half.
My favorite defensive play came in the first quarter, with Navy up 14-0. What looked like an option run in one direction became a pass to the tight end running in the other direction:
Clint Sovie didn’t overpursue the option look. Instead, he recognized the play action, recovered, and held the play to a minimal gain. One or two years ago, this kind of misdirection would’ve resulted in a big gain. Now, the Navy defense is much more disciplined.
As exciting as it was to see the offense explode the way it did, I’m not sure how much there is to learn from this game. When a team full of freshmen and sophomores carries out a mediocre game plan that the other side is prepared for, obliteration happens. By the end of it, Coach Jasper had to be thinking to himself, “We run the option, and our backups are in the game! How are we supposed to keep from running up the score? Pass?” But hey, there’s nothing like a good blowout to cleanse the soul. Just don’t let it go to your head.
Postgame Haiku, Vol. 24
Rice versus Navy:
Great seats still available
For blowout central.
GAME WEEK: RICE
The more you have invested in a game, the more difficult it is to move on afterward. Here we are, still e-yelling at each other about the offense almost a week after the Air Force game… And we’re just fans. Imagine how hard it must be for the people who actually invest time and effort preparing for it. (No, remembering to set your DVR doesn’t count as “effort”). No matter how physically and emotionally drained they might be, the players have to suit up, focus, and start practice again on Monday. So it goes for the Navy football team as they enter another crucial stretch in the schedule.
On paper, Rice and SMU would seem to be two of the less daunting teams the Mids have to face this year, entering the weekend with a combined record of 2-7. Not that there’s any team that Navy can chalk up as an automatic win, obviously, but one would figure that the Mids would have a better chance against the Owls and Mustangs than they would with some of the other luminaries on the schedule. Then again, each game isn’t played in a vacuum; they’re played as part of a larger season, and timing doesn’t exactly favor the Mids. Navy is following up a physically and mentally exhausting rivalry win with a pair of long road trips back and forth from Texas, in a season where the Mids have yet to win on the road. When placed in that context, the next two weeks figure to be as challenging as any other. First on the docket in Navy’s Texas two-step is Rice.
Playing in Texas helps Navy’s recruiting efforts, and as such Rice has been a regular on Navy schedules since the ’90s. The two teams last met in 2005, when Matt Hall ran for 91 yards and 2 TDs to lead Navy to a 41-9 victory. It’s hard to imagine a program being so different after only four years; no team in the country has had a more roller coaster existence than Rice. The story actually begins a year earlier, when the future of Rice football and the entire athletics program came into question. I started following the situation when a Rice message board linked a piece I wrote for Scout.com regarding the role athletics play in fulfilling the Naval Academy’s mission. While Rice and the Naval Academy don’t share the same mission, they do face many of the same pressures and misconceptions regarding athletics and the benefits they bring to the school. In April of 2004, the Rice faculty commissioned a study that concluded that a de-emphasis of athletics, including an end to the football program, would be best for the school. In response to this report, the Board of Trustees commissioned a study of their own by McKinsey & Co. to examine its findings and make a recommendation to the Board; options on the table included doing away with football, dropping to Division III, or dissolving the athletic department altogether. When word of these studies were leaked to Rice fans and alumni, their reaction was immediate. Rallies and a massive letter-writing campaign organized by a newly formed “Friends of Rice Athletics” group overwhelmed the Board of Trustees. Bobby May, the Rice AD at the time, talked about the campaign’s effectiveness:
“The Board was totally taken aback; it was knocked off balance by the efforts of those who took the time to write – not just because of the volume, but because of the quality and the logic of the response.”
The other side was overwhelmed, outworked, disarmed and outclassed. One Board member remarked that the work of the Friends of Rice Athletics, and those who wrote, was far better than that put forth by McKinsey.”
With that, Rice football had new life. Rather than drop the program, the school launched a renewed effort to make it better. Rice left the WAC in 2005 in favor of Conference USA. As a member of the C-USA, Rice is able to play most of their games in Texas, maintain some of its old Southwest Conference rivalries, and compete in a West division that consists primarily of private schools (Rice, Tulsa, SMU, and Tulane). It’s a win for the program. In 2006, one of the more underappreciated old venues in college football, Rice Stadium, underwent renovations that included a new playing surface and a modern scoreboard. The most significant changes, though, have come on the field. Ken Hatfield, who had coached on South Main for 12 years, resigned after a 1-10 season in 2005. Hatfield had strayed a bit from his pure wishbone roots, but still employed a running offense based on wishbone power running principles. His replacement was Tulsa defensive coordinator Todd Graham, who hired Major Applewhite to be his offensive coordinator. Graham said at the time,
“We want to spread the field and throw the football, and every quarterback and receiver in this state will be interested in Rice with Major as our offensive coordinator.”
Sounds great, but probably not the easiest transition after running the wishbone. Not surprisingly, the team got off to a 1-5 start. Soon, though, Applewhite found his answer in a pair of sophomores: quarterback Chase Clement and wide receiver Jarett Dillard. A last-second pass from Clement to Dillard lifted Rice to a dramatic 34-33 win over UAB and sparked a six-game winning streak that put Rice at 7-5 and gave them their first Bowl berth in 45 years. Although the Owls lost in the New Orleans Bowl, the program appeared to be headed in the right direction. It was… Until Graham’s former employer came calling. Steve Kragthorpe left to take the Louisville job, and Graham returned to Tulsa to take his place after only a year at Rice. This time Rice tuned to the I-AA ranks to find their new coach, hiring David Bailiff away from Texas State. Bailiff was a former defensive coordinator at TCU, and led Texas State to an 11-3 record and a berth in the I-AA semifinals. Year one of the Bailiff era wasn’t exactly the stuff of dreams. Rice fell back into despair, finishing 3-9 and giving up a ridiculous 42 points per game. Year two, on the other hand, couldn’t have gone much better. The Clement-Dillard combo led Rice to a 10-win season, including a win in the Texas Bowl– Rice’s first bowl victory since 1954.
By the looks of the 2009 season, you’d never guess that the 2008 season was one of the most successful in Rice history. The graduation of Clement and Dillard have returned the sine wave of Rice football back to the trough, as the Owls enter the Navy game at 0-5 and giving up 40.6 points per game. A lot of that has to do with playing Oklahoma State and Texas Tech, of course, and in fact the team is coming off of its best defensive performance of the season against a prolific Tulsa offense. Of course, when a 27-10 loss is your best game of the season, you’ve probably seen better days. The constant turnover has hurt Rice recruiting, leading to some thin classes and forcing them to start younger players. Four of Bailiff’s five starters on the offensive line are sophomores, and the defensive two-deep features 15 freshmen or sophomores. Only eight seniors were listed on the depth chart last week against Tulsa. The few upperclassmen they have, though, include some talented players, particularly on defense. Scott Solomon, a 6-3, 265-lb. defensive end, had three sacks last week and is fifth all-time in that category in Rice history. Preseason all-conference safety Andrew Sendejo is a dual threat, having led the team in tackles for two consecutive years and sitting sixth in the country in punt return average. Still, it hasn’t been enough to overcome youth and injury, with the Owls playing three different quarterbacks this year.
Not that there’s no reason for hope, though. Bailiff has seen the spread option before. Actually, he’s had a bit of success against it; his 2005 playoff run included wins over both Georgia Southern and Cal Poly. The defense is coming off of its best performance of the season, and injured quarterback Nick Fanuzzi is set to return. Fanuzzi led the Owls on three TD drives against Oklahoma State, but missed the last two games with a shoulder injury. Does all this, plus hitting a soft spot on the Navy schedule, have the makings of an upset? Probably not. But Rice will spread out the Navy defense, and their 4-2-5 scheme on defense will give the Mids a look they haven’t seen yet this year. There’s no rest for a weary Navy squad.
NAVY 16, AIR FORCE 13
In the 2006 season opener against East Carolina, quarterback Brian Hampton carried the ball 34 times for 149 yards as the Mids defeated the Pirates, 28-23. ECU made an effort to take away the slotbacks in the triple option, stepping into pitching lanes and even batting down a couple. The defense forced the quarterback and fullback to carry the load for the offense, with the two positions accounting for 52 of the team’s 70 carries. After spending all afternoon running between the tackles, Paul Johnson likened the offense’s day to “playing in a phone booth.”
If that was playing in a phone booth, then Saturday’s 16-13 victory over Air Force might be described as playing like the offense was trapped at the bottom of a well. Ricky Dobbs and fullbacks Vince Murray and Alex Teich combined for 52 of Navy’s 56 carries as the Mids were held to 209 yards of total offense. After Dobbs’ touchdown run on the Mids’ first drive, Navy failed to get a first down on seven of its next ten possessions. There came a point in the second half where I started getting worried that watching the game any longer might turn me into a pillar of salt. WHATEVER COACH JASPER DID TO OFFEND YOU, KARMA, SURELY THAT DEBT IS NOW PAID.
We’ll get to that, but first let’s take a look at what I said after last year’s Air Force game:
Those of us who have been Navy fans all our lives might see things a little bit differently. There was a time when the idea of beating Air Force with half our offense tied behind our back was completely unfathomable. Air Force used to be so talented relative to Navy that only a flawless effort in every phase of the game would give the Mids a chance. Now, the tables have turned. Not only did Navy win with a watered-down offense, but they scored 33 points! For me, Navy’s victory on Saturday was nothing short of brilliant.
Other than the whole 33 points thing, my feelings towards the 2009 game are nearly identical. Yes, the offense was lousy, but you can’t lose sight of the big picture here. Navy beat Air Force for the seventh straight year. If you’re new to the program, or only started caring when the team became good, or if you only go to Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium to drink wine at a tailgater and complain about the length of TV timeouts… Well, maybe that’s not enough for you. The rest of us are thrilled. In the 21 years prior to the current Navy winning streak, the Mids beat Air Force twice. Do you think in those years anyone would be turning up their noses at an ugly, 16-13 win? Hell no. Yes, Navy is a better team now, and expectations are higher. That doesn’t mean that anyone needs to start worrying about style points when it comes to service academy victories. I understand that every game is played in the context of a larger season, and that we all want to see various problems addressed. But if your first instinct after such a dramatic win over a service academy rival is to complain about the offense, then you have completely forgotten what it means to be a Navy fan. If I ever reach the point where I take wins over Army and Air Force for granted, feel free to kick me in the face.
The shame in all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the offense is that it’s distracting from what should be the focus, which is a dominating performance by the defense. At the beginning of the season, we knew the young, largely unproven offense was going to sputter once in a while. If the Navy team was going to reach its goals in 2009, the defense was going to have to win some games for them. There were encouraging signs through the first four games that they’d be able to do so, but until it happens, you’re never really sure. Well, now you can be sure. The Mids were suffocating on defense, holding Air Force to 249 yards of total offense while forcing two turnovers and keeping the Falcons out of the end zone. Their 3 & out on Air Force’s first posession might have been the difference in the game, giving the Navy offense excellent field position on their first drive to set up the game’s only offensive touchdown. Ross Pospisil was his usual dependable self, leading the way with 12 tackles. If Joe Buckley hadn’t been Mr. Automatic, a strong case could be made for Wyatt Middleton as the game’s MVP. Middleton was all over the field, making 9 tackles in run support while breaking up two passes in coverage. The line also had a banner day, with Matt Nechak and Jabaree Tuani combining for 14 tackles. You can point out a good play by just about any Navy defender that got into the game.
The corollary to the complaints about the Navy offense has been to heap praise upon the Air Force defense. They played well too, but they shouldn’t be overshadowing the defense that actually, you know, won. Contrary to what some would have you believe, there’s nothing wrong with winning games with defense. Hell, two years after fielding what seemed like the worst defense in history, it’s downright refreshing. It turns out that games won with defense count just as much toward bowl eligibility as shootouts. Who knew? Younger fans might have an excuse, but anyone old enough to remember the George Welsh years should recall that Navy won games primarily through superb defense and a ball-control offense. I can only imagine the comments we’d have seen if we had the internet back then. OMG WHY DO WE KEEP HANDING OFF TO GATTUSO?? LESZCZYNSKI NEEDS TO PASS MORE!
Still, you have to give credit to Air Force for their defensive game plan. I didn’t think the game had to be so close, but when Navy was unable to make use of its two biggest advantages– slotback speed and Ricky’s arm– it’s no surprise that the score was tight. Not that Coach Jasper didn’t try to get the ball to his weapons. Navy’s first play of the game was a toss sweep that, as a harbinger of things to come, was blown up by the Air Force cornerback. Our intrepid offensive coordinator continued to call pass plays throughout the game as well, but most of them devolved into scrambles almost immediately. Coincidentally, those scrambles were Navy’s most successful running plays on the afternoon.
Navy’s offense started the day picking up where they left off in last year’s game, handing the ball off to the fullback. The first drive consisted primarily of designed handoffs to Alex Teich. Actually, other than the shorter field it was very similar to the first drive against Ohio State; the fullback carried the load until the last play, when the defense’s overpursuit of the fullback left a running lane open for Ricky to scoot to the end zone. The Mids didn’t run an actual option play until its third possession, at the very end of the first quarter. The first play of the drive was another called handoff to the fullback. The cornerback crept closer to the ball before the snap. On the next play, Coach Jasper called the triple option. The cornerback cheated toward the ball again. This puts him in the count; he’s #3, and the playside slotback should pick him up. He doesn’t, though, opting instead to head upfield and block a linebacker. Even though Ricky is given a read to pitch, he can’t; the unblocked cornerback would blow up the play. Ricky is forced to hold onto the ball for a minimal gain.
After that, Air Force settled into their option game plan. Their goal was to take away Navy’s big-play ability outside, forcing Navy to run into the strength of the defense. They did this in two steps. First, the pitch key almost always played the pitch. He didn’t wait for the quarterback to get outside, either; he ran straight into the backfield to show his intent. Second, the give key used the mesh charge to confuse the quarterback. The mesh charge is a very difficult read, as the defender basically fakes taking the fullback dive and steps upfield to take the quarterback at the last second. The combination of the two puts the quarterback in extremis almost immediately.
Ricky was able to adjust to the mesh charge and make the correct read more often than not. Since he was clearly being forced to run up the middle, Coach Jasper tried calling the midline to give Air Force a different look:
It might have worked more often than it did if nose guard Ben Garland didn’t absolutely own the middle of the field.
Garland wasn’t alone. The option isn’t the only way to get the ball to the slotbacks on the perimeter. But no matter how you try, you have to block the cornerbacks. Navy could not. The Mids’ inability to block Air Force’s corners was reminiscent of the futility of trying to block Scott McKillop against Pitt in 2008. Whenever someone tried to block him, McKillop just sidestepped him and kept moving. The Air Force cornerbacks were doing that all afternoon.
Obviously, it wasn’t exactly a banner day for the Navy offense. You might ask, “where were the adjustments?” Well, no matter what you adjust to, at some point someone’s got to start blocking. Navy had a hard time with that concept on Saturday. Air Force had a lot to do with that.
Still, after five games, Navy is sitting pretty: 3-2 after a brutal stretch of opponents, with half of the Commander in Chief’s Trophy competition in the bag. But what will become of Air Force? The knock on Fisher DeBerry at the end of his tenure in Colorado Springs was that after his team lost to Navy, their season would fall apart. That might have been true in 2003, but after that it’s complete revisionist history. From 2004-2006, Air Force wasn’t all that great going into the Navy game to begin with; their combined pre-Navy record in those years was only 6-6. The season was already in trouble by the time they got to the Navy game, and in each of those years they actually followed up the loss to the Mids with a conference win. Sometimes revisionist history rules the day, though, and to Troy Calhoun’s benefit. One thing that Calhoun has been given a lot of credit for is holding Air Force’s season together after losing to Navy, well enough to earn bids to two straight Armed Forces Bowls. I’m not so sure that’s going to happen this year. Like Navy, Air Force is also 3-2. But their next 4 games include #10 TCU, plus road games at Utah and a much-improved Colorado State team. Even Wyoming is 3-2 right now. It’s entirely possible for Air Force to be 4-5 after that stretch and needing a win at BYU to secure a winning record. 6-6 is a real possibility for this team.

So what’s different? Why is Air Force staring .500 in the face after going 17-9 in Calhoun’s first two seasons? Shouldn’t the team be getting better in year three? Well, they are on one side of the ball. Defensively, Air Force has been excellent, and that doesn’t look to change much next year with 7 starters returning. The offense is a different story. One would think that this would be the year that they’d break out, with seniors starting at all five offensive line positions plus tight end. Who wouldn’t want to run behind that? Despite that experience, the unit has been held without a touchdown for two consecutive games, and only has four against I-A competition all year. The culprit, according to some, is conservative playcalling. Was it? Air Force was the one throwing 14 passes on Saturday. Air Force was the one taking shots downfield in the first half– one being intercepted by Emmett Merchant, and the other almost meeting the same fate courtesy of Wyatt Middleton. Air Force was the one calling end-arounds, attacking the perimeter, and using double-reverse play-action. Maybe they played things close to the vest in overtime, but not during regulation. It only appeared “conservative” because frankly, they didn’t have enough speed to make those plays work. Receivers running downfield were matched step-for-step by Navy defensive backs. When Tim Jefferson completed passes underneath, his receivers couldn’t generate any yards after the catch. When Jonathan Warzeka tried to get to the corner, he couldn’t outrun Navy’s inside-out pursuit. Despite the bellyaching, Air Force’s most successful plays on Saturday were the “conservative” ones, when Savier Stephens would run up the middle behind that veteran offensive line.
If it wasn’t razzle-dazzle that Air Force was missing on Saturday, perhaps it was something else. While Calhoun used zone reads and other option plays, the triple option was very sparingly employed. That might be because he has two sophomore quarterbacks sitting on top of his depth chart. Air Force has had a bit of a continuity problem at quarterback. A mass exodus from their prep school left them with few options, and now Jefferson is set to become the school’s second straight four-year starter at the position. It sounds like a good thing, but it really isn’t. It’s one thing to start a freshman or a sophomore because that player is just that damn good. It’s another to start a freshman or sophomore because you have no other choice. Air Force is experiencing the latter. That’s not a slight to Jefferson; it’s just reality. He is going to become more comfortable in the offense, and Calhoun’s playcalling options will expand. Unfortunately for Jefferson, though, by the time that happens, he won’t have that super-experienced line blocking for him. Obviously there’s a lot of football left to be played this year, and a team can improve over the course of the season. But Air Force hasn’t exactly faced the Monsters of the Midway so far this year; it’s going to be a lot harder to get better against the likes of TCU and Utah.
But that’s their problem. Right now, Navy has two road games of their own to deal with in the next two weeks, heading to Texas to take on Rice and SMU. While the team has to move on, at least they do so knowing that they can still achieve all their goals. Well, except maybe the rushing title.
EXTRA POINTS
— It’s time for Air Force players to stop saying they want the trophy “back.” Yes, they want the trophy, just like Army and Navy’s players do. But no current Air Force player has ever won the CIC Trophy. When these seniors were freshmen, none of their seniors had won it either. These players are two generations removed from having it. There is no “back.” The idea that service academy games are nothing more than an Air Force victory lap is now officially out of style, like Hypercolor t-shirts and Tommy Toughnuts phrases like “it’s on like friggin’ Donkey Kong.” Players, fans, and media alike are encouraged to embrace this reality.
DOWN ON THE FARM: JV VS. NAPS
Two Fridays ago, the NAPS squad traveled to Annapolis to take on Navy’s JV Football team. The weather conditions were much more favorable for the 2:30 kickoff than they were two weeks prior vs. Hargrave. Temps were in the upper 70’s, skies were blue, and the wind was a non-factor most of the day.
Postgame Haiku, Vol. 23
Offensive football
Was set back seventy years.
I don’t seem to care.
GAME WEEK: AIR FORCE
If you’ve been reading this lousy blog long enough… I apologize. Really. For everything. But in the time you’ve subjected yourself to this horrible place, you might have noticed that I don’t have much use for the national media, at least when it comes to Navy sports. I don’t watch Sportscenter, rarely catch more than the last 15 minutes or so of Gameday before the noon games start, and read next to nothing from the sports page of most national newspapers, save for the occasional column. The reason for my disdain is that each and every one of you reading this right now know more about Navy football than anyone from ESPN or whatever other national clearinghouse from which you’re getting your news and analysis. That doesn’t just apply to Navy; you could say that about anyone. To obtain a real understanding of a team, you have to read their local stuff. It’s the only way. If you’re happy with platitudes and human interest stories, though, Gameday has you covered. I laugh when the message board crowd gets excited over WOW LEE CORSO PICKED NAVY TO UPSET PITT, even though Lee Corso can’t name more than three people combined from both teams’ rosters. OMG SPORTSLINE RANKS NAVY 64TH or whatever is equally meaningless, since Navy is being ranked against 119 other teams the website’s prognosticators don’t know anything about. For the same reason, I also don’t get too spun up if these places don’t rank Navy very highly. These guys take a stab for the casual football fan to skim over, but that’s all. Hardcore fans are best served looking elsewhere.
I know, I know… Thanks for the lecture, Mike, but nobody cares what you think and Herbstreit is dreamy, so have fun with your Spongebob on Saturday mornings while I watch Gameday and read me some news. I get it. But don’t pretend you don’t get annoyed when you read that “Air Force tends to get a higher caliber of player than Navy.” You know you ask yourself where on earth the Troy Calhoun love affair comes from, and why Ken Niumatalolo doesn’t get nearly the same kind of credit for his work at the Naval Academy. And why does it seem like people are so anxious to hand the Commander-In-Chief’s Trophy back to Air Force year after year? Now, it’s not as if the very thought of Air Force being a better football team is so outrageous. They have good players, and they win games. I’m sure someone could construct a detailed argument to support the idea… But they don’t. These proclamations are rarely accompanied by anything resembling an in-depth comparison of the two teams. It’s usually a one-liner, followed by something like “last year/two years/three years were a fluke!” or “Troy Calhoun is the real deal!” or “Navy isn’t the same without Paul Johnson!” (That last one is especially funny to me, since these people would still pick Air Force even when Johnson was the coach.)
So if it isn’t actual analysis that inspires all these people to think Air Force is so great, then what is it? The same reason why everyone is so anxious to say that Florida State, Miami, and Michigan are “back”: reputation. That’s all there is to it. It’s just what people are used to. It’s bogus, of course, but it’s what you’re left with when you don’t have the time or inclination to take a detailed look. It usually works out well enough since, generally speaking, good programs are good programs for a reason– some schools just have inherent advantages in money, location, admissions standards, etc. The service academy football experiment, though, happens in its own little petri dish. Air Force might one day have a built-in advantage if the Mountain West ever gets a BCS auto-bid, but I wouldn’t hold my breath for that; the same goes for Army and the Alternative “Service” Option. As far as things stand right now, the service academies all have more or less the same tools to work with; the Naval Academy might have a small advantage in the number of service options available upon commissioning, but I doubt Army’s or Air Force’s coaches see that as much of an obstacle. People picking Air Force– or Navy, for that matter– to be kings of the service academy mountain because they’re supposed to be there are mistaken.
The whole “this is the way things are supposed to happen” way of thinking can infect fans and players as much as the media. Navy has defeated Air Force for six consecutive years, but as we’re constantly reminded, none of them were blowouts. That’s because it’s Navy-Air Force! It’s going to be a tight one! It always is! Right? Well, once upon a time the same was said about the Army-Navy game– the ol’ “throw out the records when these teams meet” cliché. That’s how things usually played out, too. In the 11 years from 1991-2001, the margin of victory was less than 5 points seven times. But then a strange thing happened. In the 2002 game, the Mids went up 14-3 early in the second quarter when Craig Candeto punched in his second 1-yard TD run. When he got back to the sideline, Candeto said something, and it might have been the exact moment Navy football turned the corner as a program. Candeto told the offense, “Guys, this doesn’t have to be close.” And it wasn’t. Navy walked out of the Meadowlands having racked up 508 yards of offense in a 58-12 victory. The rivalry– and the team– haven’t been the same since. Part of me wonders if the whole “it’s always a close one” mentality becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy for Navy when they play Air Force. Contrary to the mainstream, I don’t think this is an even matchup. I think Navy is the better team, hands down. No, that doesn’t mean that the Mids are going to come out and hang 58 on Team Jesus Christ on Saturday. Air Force is clearly not the 2002 Army team, and is fully capable of winning this game. I just don’t think they will.
That might seem unusually confident coming from me, but it’s fueled in part by what looks like a remarkable lack of confidence from Troy Calhoun in his team. I’ve made fun of the new Air Force media guidelines a couple times here, but it wasn’t until last week that its true nature really began to come to the surface. Falcons quarterback Tim Jefferson was hurt early in the game against New Mexico; he left and didn’t return. The Tuesday after the game, Jefferson spoke about his injury, saying that his ankle was “between 60 and 80 percent.” Two days later, a new policy was handed down from Calhoun on top of the already stringent rules that were issued earlier this season: no more talking to injured players. The message Calhoun is sending is clear; he doesn’t trust his players. The easy solution would be to give players a little guidance on what they should and shouldn’t say to the media like every other program in the country, but it would appear that Troy Calhoun doesn’t believe his players can handle that.
Depending on who you ask, that lack of confidence may be manifesting itself on the field as well. Last week’s game against San Diego State wasn’t exactly an offensive performance for the ages; the Air Force defense actually outscored the offense, and had the team’s only touchdowns. Afterwards, Calhoun stated that he intentionally kept things conservative on offense. OK, that happens. We’ve seen Navy do it before, most notably in the 2007 Army game. Of course, Paul Johnson wasn’t calling any double reverses in that game, either. Air Force did against San Diego State– more than once, actually– which makes you wonder if Calhoun was really scaling things back. He was, but only if you define “scaling things back” as “not passing much.” Otherwise, it was the same Air Force running game we’ve seen all year.
To give you an idea of how the Air Force offense has been performing, consider this: Navy scored as many offensive touchdowns against Ohio State as Air Force scored against Minnesota, San Diego State, and New Mexico combined. The Falcons have averaged 6 ypg less than Navy against I-A competition, and Navy has faced not only the Buckeyes, but also Pitt, and a Louisiana Tech team that won 8 games a year ago and just held Hawaii to 301 total yards on Wednesday night (Hawaii was averaging 521 ypg coming into that game). Air Force has made 14 trips into their I-A opponents’ red zones so far this year. Ten of those trips resulted in 3 points or less. Maybe Calhoun played things close to the vest against the Aztecs, but for the entire season? No way.
The problem for Air Force last year against Navy was that they just didn’t have any offensive playmakers. There were instances in last year’s game where a player would take the ball on a pitch and have gobs of real estate in front of him, but couldn’t get any more than a first down out of the play. The issue seems to have creeped its way into 2009. Air Force has yet to find a player to replace Chad Hall. Hall was named the Mountain West Offensive Player of the Year in 2007 after finishing third nationally in all-purpose yards and leading the Falcons in both rushing (1,478 yards) and receiving (524 yards). In contrast, Air Force’s leading rusher in 2008 was Todd Newell, with all of 594 yards. Hall was the one player on the team that was fast enough to turn any play into six points. This year, Air Force doesn’t have a run longer than 26 yards against I-A competition. The threat just hasn’t presented itself. Asher Clark, the quarterback-turned-tailback-turned-quarterback-turned-tailback that emerged after the loss to Navy last year, might be the answer. He finished with 588 rushing yards in only 8 full games as a freshman. But he injured his shoulder against San Diego State, and Calhoun hasn’t said anything about his status for Saturday’s game. Even if he plays– and I suspect he will– he’s only a sophomore, and hasn’t reached Hall-like ability yet. Navy’s defense is making fewer and fewer mistakes in 2009, and has become the strength of this team. Air Force has to capitalize whenever they can. They just haven’t shown that they have the horses to be able to do so.
It’s a different story on the other side of the ball. A solid unit in ’08, the Air Force defense has wasted no time picking up where it left off, and then some. The Falcons rank 20th nationally in total defense, and have allowed a cool 106 yards per game against the run. That’s impressive enough on its own, but the most remarkable thing has been their ability to create turnovers and turn them into points. Air Force leads the nation in takeaways with 15. Four of them were returned for touchdowns, including two against San Diego State alone. Where the offense has struggled in creating big plays, the defense has picked up the slack. Last year, the Air Force defense held Navy to a mere 244 yards of total offense. Many people point to that performance as the sign that this is Air Force’s year.
Navy’s offense sort of went through three phases in Colorado Springs last year. At the beginning of the game, Jarod Bryant actually did a pretty good job in making the right option reads; a feat made even more impressive by the fact that Air Force was doing a good job showing him different reads on almost every play. There were two problems, though. One, Air Force clearly had no respect for Bryant as a passer, and sent a safety running full speed to the line of scrimmage on almost every play. Two, Air Force’s defensive line was dominant in the first half. Even though Jarod was making the correct reads, it didn’t look like it; he kept getting tackled for minimal gains. Take a look at this play:
Jarod makes the right read here, but defensive end Jake Paulson is so athletic that he’s able to recover from initially taking the fullback, and tackles Bryant from behind. Plays like this led to phase two of the Navy offense: Jarod, having made the right reads but still being unable to get the offense kickstarted, lost his confidence in what he was seeing and started making the wrong reads. In an effort to stop the bleeding, the Navy coaches moved on to phase three in the 4th quarter: just giving the ball to Eric Kettani on every play. By then, Navy had established a little bit of a lead, and was content with just getting a couple of first downs and punting, playing field position and preventing a turnover that would give the Falcons another short field to work with (the Mids fumbled 4 times in that game, losing two). Air Force managed to score a late TD to make it a one-score game, but Navy ran out the last 2:30 to clinch the victory.
It was a spirited effort on the part of the Air Force defense, and as solid a gameplan as we’ve seen… But replicating that performance will be a lot easier said than done. Air Force can’t completely disregard the pass this year, thanks to Ricky Dobbs. That keeps the playside safety from selling out in run support. Air Force also no longer has Paulson and fellow bookend Ryan Kemp, two players on the defensive line whose individual efforts went a long way in disrupting Navy’s option game. Especially Paulson– first-team all-conference players aren’t exactly a dime a dozen. Myles Morales and Rick Ricketts have done their jobs, but through 4 games they’ve combined for only 18 tackles. They should be a better matchup for Navy’s tackles, both of whom were only sophomores in 2008.
One player that Air Force still has in their defensive arsenal is nose guard Ben Garland. Statistically, Garland didn’t appear to be much of a factor last year, tallying all of one tackle against Navy. But that’s why you can’t just look at a stat sheet. Garland played an excellent game, and has single-handedly influenced Navy personnel decisions because of it. Bill Wagner wrote an insightful piece on the center-nose guard battle in last year’s contest. Coach Niumatalolo didn’t change all that much when Paul Johnson left, but one change he did make was at center. Because Air Force plays with a 5-man front against Navy with a nose guard lined up over the center, Niumat felt that he should put a bigger, stronger player at center to get a better push. Ricky Moore was moved to center to do just that, and he had a great year… Except against Air Force. Moore was never able to push Garland out of the way. Garland didn’t use his 275-pound frame to try to get leverage on Moore; instead, he used his hands to simply shed Moore’s cut blocks and get around him.
That’s a well-coached defensive tackle right there, and he’s back for another year. Moore’s size was a non-factor. Because of that, Navy’s coaches opted to make a change at center, moving the larger but less experienced Brady DeMell back to guard in favor of senior Curtis Bass, widely considered Navy’s best offensive lineman. As heavily as Air Force relies on its defense, the Bass-Garland showdown is the key matchup of this game.
One could easily argue that Navy has playmakers of its own to replace on offense. But Marcus Curry has emerged as a big-play threat, as has Ricky Dobbs as a passer. Those two, plus Bobby Doyle and Alex Teich, all have plays as long as anything Air Force has run against non-Nicholls State competition. Air Force will do their best to confuse Ricky, and will probably find some success with it. But as long as Ricky doesn’t turn those mistakes into turnovers, Navy should come away with the win.
(Pray that I’m right, because if not, the comments on this blog are going to be unreadable for a while, BROTHER).
NAVY 38, WKU 22
After laying an egg against Pittsburgh a week ago, the Navy football team was hoping to get that bad taste out of their mouths. The defense played well against the Panthers in a lot of ways, but gave up some big plays through the air; the offense didn’t do much of anything right. They could put that performance behind them by putting together a complete game against the Hilltoppers of Western Kentucky. The Mids, led by Ricky Dobbs’ 143 rushing yards and 5 total touchdowns, won the game comfortably, 38-22. Whether that exorcised the demons of the previous week, however, is up for debate.
Offensively, it probably did. Ricky dominated the stat sheet, but he wasn’t the only Mid to have a good day. Bobby Doyle had 104 total yards from scrimmage, including a 24-yard streak down the sideline and a 47-yard pass reception. Marcus Curry chipped in 70 yards on only 5 carries, and Cory Finnerty added a touchdown reception. Vince Murray, who stepped in for an injured Alexander Teich, picked up 54 yards. Overall the Mids had a that’s-more-like-it 373 rushing yards, their highest total of the season. All is well, right?
We’ll see. Honestly, I’m not sure how much we really learned about the offense in this game. WKU is one of those rare teams that don’t physically outmatch the Mids, with players like a 5-11, 270-pound nose guard up front. Being smaller doesn’t mean that they can’t play, of course; it’s just not typical of what Navy is going to see for the rest of the season. On top of that, the WKU game plan wasn’t nearly as good as I thought it would be. Let’s take a look at Ricky’s first touchdown, a 29-yard option run. WKU came out in a similar double eagle-type look that we’ve seen all season. What that means is that they had 4 men on the line of scrimmage, but instead of being balanced on both sides of the center, they had a nose guard over the ball, two on one side of him, and one split wide on the other. Before the snap, one of the safeties comes down in run support and lines up within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. When he does so, he enters the count. This creates a numbers advantage on the other side of the formation. Ricky sees this, audibles, and runs the other way. The remaining safety spies the tail motion A-back, meaning there’s nobody to catch Ricky when he turns upfield.
WKU was doing this all afternoon. The safety biting on the tail motion is what made Cory Finnerty and Bobby Doyle so wide open on their pass plays. Eventually, the safety stopped spying the A-back and took the quarterback. He clocked Ricky, who might not have even seen him coming, but that left Marcus Curry free to run all over the field on the pitch. In the end, Navy’s offense had a big day… But they should have had a big day. The defense just wasn’t that good. Then again, after the Pitt game, a little confidence can’t hurt.
One can only hope that the defense doesn’t lose any. After being the strength of the team for the first three games, the unit did not exactly impress. Western Kentucky entered the game having a hard time moving the ball on anyone. I mean, Central Arkansas held them to 287 yards, so for the Mids to give up 434 yards to the Hilltoppers is a bit disturbing. Fortunately, with a fumble at the goal line, a missed field goal, and 10 (!) penalties, WKU did a pretty good job stopping themselves, and in the process demonstrated why they are 0-4.
The most troubling thing, given Navy’s next opponent, is that the play that the defense struggled the most against was the option. When WKU was running north-south, the Mids were their usual, immovable selves. When the Hilltoppers started running the zone read, though, the defense looked lost.
I say “zone read” because I’m not sure what else to call it. On the usual zone read play, the last down lineman on the back side of the play is left unblocked. If he heads for the mesh, the QB hands the ball off to the running back. If he starts running down the line to take the running back, the QB keeps and runs towards the space that his read vacated. That’s not really what WKU was doing, though. They blocked everyone at the line of scrimmage. The quarterback read a middle linebacker, and simply sent the ball wherever the ILB didn’t go:
This left the linebackers so preoccupied with the run that they bit hard on every run fake. Notice on this next play how the linebackers play the run. By moving to the line of scrimmage instead of dropping into coverage, it leaves a huge gap in coverage between the LBs and the secondary. The primary beneficiary was the tight end, Jack Doyle, who not only caught this pass, but five more for 80 yards. The TE would usually be covered by a linebacker.
Opposing quarterbacks looking like the second coming of John Hadl have been an all-too-frustrating trademark of the Navy defense over the last two years. Kawaun Jakes is a freshman, but against the Mids you wouldn’t have known. Now, you can’t mention the performance of the defense without also mentioning how depleted the unit was. Ram Vela, Clint Sovie, and Jabaree Tuani all either played sparingly, or played hurt. That forced Wyatt Middleton to play out of position, and he did not look comfortable at all at linebacker. If you asked me if this was just a bad day or if it was a sign of things to come for the defense, I’d take the former. And Blake Carter is still awesome on wheels.
Still, it’s not really a note of confidence on which to head into the Air Force game. That doesn’t mean it’s time to panic, either. Yes, the Mids stunk on option plays, but that’s not really the kind of stuff that Air Force runs. Actually, you could say there is a bit of silver lining in all this. We’ve seen the defense pick up the slack to help carry the team until the offense got in gear. We sort of expected that this year. But now we’ve seen the offense carry the game when the defense struggled, which can only boost that unit’s morale. Yeah, it was only Western Kentucky. But we should know by now that any win at Navy is a good win. I’ll take it.