MONDAY POLL: MVP

Last week I asked for Navy’s biggest win since 2003. 174 of you voted, and the predictably resounding winner was the 2007 Notre Dame game, with 123 votes. I tried to make my case for 2003 Air Force, but I failed to sway the steely-eyed and uncompromising jury of Birddog readers.

This week, we give out the People’s Choice award for MVP of the Air Force game. Do you vote for a playmaker or a workhorse? The candidates:

  • Jarod Bryant: 24 carries, 101 yards, and a touchdown.
  • Eric Kettani: 75 of the toughest yards you’ll ever see.
  • Greg Shinego: Blocked punt #1, setting the tone for the game.
  • Blake Carter: Returned the first blocked punt for a TD and blocked a punt of his own. He sat at my table at the bowl luncheon in Charlotte. Naturally, I take credit for his performance.
  • Matt Harmon: As far as we know, there’s no rule against laser-guided footballs.
  • Nate Frazier: General beastliness.

Make your case!

NAVY 33, AIR FORCE 27

How you feel about Saturday’s 33-27 victory at Air Force probably depends on your frame of reference.

In the context of the 2008 season, it was not a very good game for the Mids. It was a win, so it wasn’t a disaster; but that doesn’t mean that everyone played well. The Navy defense, so stout a week ago at Wake Forest, took a step backwards. Air Force was able to pile up 411 yards of offense, the most they’ve had against I-A competition this year. Navy was never able to contain the pitch man on the option, and the Falcons made more big plays in the passing game than they had in their other four games combined. It didn’t get any better on the offensive side of the ball. Navy’s 244 yards of total offense was the team’s lowest output since the 2006 Rutgers game, when Brian Hampton’s shin was involuntarily separated from his thigh. As expected, the offense sputtered under Jarod Bryant. Shun White was a non-factor in the running game other than his fumble, Tyree Barnes didn’t have a catch, and the Mids were outrushed 227-206. You could say that Navy was lucky to win this game.

Those of us who have been Navy fans all our lives might see things a little bit differently. There was a time when the idea of beating Air Force with half our offense tied behind our back was completely unfathomable. Air Force used to be so talented relative to Navy that only a flawless effort in every phase of the game would give the Mids a chance. Now, the tables have turned. Not only did Navy win with a watered-down offense, but they scored 33 points! For me, Navy’s victory on Saturday was nothing short of brilliant.

Before the game I said that as long as Jarod Bryant took care of the ball, Navy’s playmakers should carry the day. Early on, taking care of the ball appeared to be a lot easier said than done, as both Jarod and Shun White coughed up fumbles that were recovered by Air Force. But for the most part, the offense settled down and the plays started to come. Bryant himself turned in a 29-yard run to set up a field goal. Shun White pulled in a pass for 38 yards that set up another field goal. Matt Harmon kicked the field goals to finish those drives, plus two more. Greg Shinego and Blake Carter each blocked punts. Nate Frazier was an absolute nightmare. Nate completely owned the center all afternoon; there were at least three plays where he was in the backfield so fast that he nearly tackled the quarterback before he could hand the ball off. You don’t think those fumbled snaps were a fluke, do you? Nate was in the center’s head. That wasn’t an accident. The bottom line is that when all was said and done, Navy made more plays because they had the players that could.

I know that probably isn’t enough for some of you, especially when the offense looked so ineffective. Why didn’t Ivin Jasper open up the playbook a little more? Well, because he didn’t have to. Navy was the better team. The only way that Air Force would win this game is if the Mids turned the ball over. So why take the chance at opening up the playbook with a quarterback that we all know isn’t as comfortable with running the offense? Air Force never led by more than 3 points, and never led after halftime. Navy had a two-score lead in the 4th quarter. So why tempt fate? What would be the point? If it appeared that things might get out of hand, you probably would have seen things open up a bit more. But Coach Jasper never had to.

Calling plays in this offense, like most offenses, isn’t just a matter of picking out a bunch of awesome plays and sending them in. There’s a natural progression, where each play sets up other plays later in the series. The problem is that for the Navy offense, the play that almost everything else is based off of is the triple option. Without that, it’s hard to open up the playbook effectively. Sure, there were still things that could be done to mix things up a bit more, but Jarod fumbled three times even playing conservatively. He isn’t a particularly good passer, and he was having trouble pitching the ball. That’s the sort of stuff you’d have to do to open up the offense, and the more you put those things to the test, the more you flirt with disaster.

It wasn’t the prettiest game, but “pretty” is overrated. The bottom line is that despite last year’s expert analysis from their athletic director, Team Jesus Christ lost to Navy for the sixth straight year. Nobody has won the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy yet, but at least we know where it isn’t going.

Some other thoughts:

— Air Force backup quarterback Tim Jefferson led the Falcons’ last scoring drive. He looked impressive… The same way Jarod Bryant looked impressive in the 4th quarter against Duke last year. It’s amazing what fresh legs can do against a tired defense. Those of you inclined to worry about everything Air Force may want to hold off on the whole “Oh noes he’s going to be awesome!!!” talk for a little while. I don’t want to be hearing about his impending Heisman Trophy the way I had to hear about Shaun Carney for four years.

— Hats off to the coaching staff for going after Air Force’s first punt. When you know that your offense isn’t going to have a good day, trying to make a play on special teams is a smart move. As for the second punt, that looked like more of an individual effort on Blake Carter’s part.

— Speaking of the second punt block… I’m not usually a fan of going for two points unless it’s truly necessary, but after Bobby Doyle recovered the ball in the end zone for a touchdown in the 4th quarter, Niumat really should have gone for the two-point conversion. With only ten minutes left in the game, a 13-point lead is no better than a 12-point lead; either way, the other team needs two touchdowns to win. But with a 14-point lead, two touchdowns most likely sends you to overtime. Maybe Niumat thought 10 minutes was enough time for Air Force to score a TD and two field goals?

— The stat sheet won’t reflect it, but Eric Kettani played a monster game. Almost every one of his 75 yards came after first contact. Take next Saturday off, Eric. You’ve earned it.

— Matt Harmon was 4 for 4 on field goals, including a 48-yarder as time expired in the first half and a 44-yarder into the wind. He is second in the country with 2.33 FGs per game, and his 93.3% accuracy leads all kickers with at least 10 attempts. He should get serious consideration for All-America honors.

GAME WEEK: AIR FORCE

In the poll question for the week, I asked what you thought was Navy’s biggest win since 2003. It was a stupid way to phrase the question, since the tear-jerking, now-I-can-die-in-peace awesomeness that was the ’07 Notre Dame game was sure to be the clear winner. I mean, really… How many other games over the last five years left you sobbing with joy? (Don’t act like you didn’t). That said, even if I rephrased the question to “what was the most important Navy win since 2003,” most of you would probably still say Notre Dame. I disagree; I think there’s an important distinction between “big” and important.” In my opinion, the most important win for the Navy program since Paul Johnson was hired was the 28-25 win over #25 Air Force in 2003.

I’m sure that seems like a stretch to some of you. After all, it’s a year later and you probably still feel a bit of disbelief over Navy finally being free from the yoke of that abominable losing streak. I sure do. But try to take emotion out of the equation for a minute. The pool of potential recruits for service academies is very small. As a result, all three schools compete with each other for the same kids. Being top dog amongst the three is a huge advantage. Now think back to 2003. Air Force was ranked 25th in the coaches’ poll coming into that game after a 24-10 win over BYU the previous week had moved them to 5-0. The Falcons hadn’t had a losing record in 10 years, and hadn’t lost to Navy since Paul Johnson’s first stint in Annapolis. They were clearly the dominant service academy football program, and for the most part won any head-to-head recruiting battle they had with Navy and Army. Shaun Carney might have been the only recruit classless enough to actually tell his Naval Academy hosts that they’d never beat Air Force, but there’s no way that he was the only one who was thinking that way. Why wouldn’t they? The track record spoke for itself. Fisher DeBerry was a legend, and when he “sent a message” by trying to run up the score in Air Force’s 48-7 win over Navy a year earlier, he was sending it to recruits as much as he was to Paul Johnson and the Navy team. The message? That nothing had changed. Air Force was still Air Force, and Navy was still Navy. Recruits had to rely on faith when Navy coaches told them better times were ahead. Air Force coaches had something a little more tangible– the Commander in Chief’s Trophy.

The statement play of a statement game.
The statement play of a statement game.

All that changed in 2003. Craig Candeto punched in a 2-yard touchdown run in the second quarter, and Navy never trailed for the rest of the game. The 28-25 Navy win was a watershed moment for both programs. From that point on, recruits didn’t have to take Paul Johnson’s word for it; they knew he could beat Air Force. Navy would go on to win six of its last eight games that season and earn a berth in the Houston Bowl, the first of five straight bowl games for the Mids. Air Force would move in the opposite direction, losing four of its next six to finish 7-5 and out of the bowl picture after that 5-0 start. It would be Fisher DeBerry’s last winning season at Air Force, as the veteran coach retired in 2006 after limping to a 4-8 record. For those four years from 2003-2006, Navy enjoyed the “seeing is believing” recruiting boost that Air Force once owned, resulting in the talented roster that you see today.

In a strange way, history is repeating itself. Given that Navy has won five straight games in the series, it’s a bit odd that it’s Ken Niumatalolo who seemingly has something to prove. Troy Calhoun lost to Navy in his first shot against the Mids, but he did lead Air Force to a 9-4 record in 2007. It was enough for various media members to proclaim the resurgence of Air Force football and hail Troy Calhoun as the real deal. Niumatalolo, however, hasn’t received the benefit of the doubt. The media consensus is that Navy just isn’t as good without Paul Johnson, even though most of those making that claim either A) almost certainly haven’t even seen Navy this year, or B) never gave Navy any credit even with Paul Johnson. Air Force was just held to 53 yards rushing against Utah while Navy is coming off of back-to-back wins over BCS opponents, including what was the highest-ranked team in the ACC; but Navy still opened the week as a 6-point underdog. For some reason, the media seems eager to hand the service academy crown back to Air Force, which makes this game as crucial to the Navy program as the 2003 game was. Recruits read the newspaper, too. Winning this game would make Coach Niumat’s job a lot easier by helping to maintain momentum on the recruiting trail.

That makes it a particularly bad time for him to lose his starting quarterback. While not an absolute certainty, Kaipo’s hamstring is probably going to keep him on the sideline once again, and Jarod Bryant will get the call to start his third game of the season. It’s been a rough season for Jarod so far. In the second quarter at Wake Forest, Jarod relieved Kaipo for the second time in three weeks. And just like in the Duke game, the offense screeched to a halt… at first. Unlike in the loss to the Blue Devils, the offense recovered a bit in the fourth quarter. First there was a toss sweep to Bobby Doyle that went for 39 yards and finally moved Navy away from their own endzone. The next drive produced a 57-yard run by Eric Kettani that set up the game-clinching touchdown. Neither were option plays, but the Doyle run was a result of an audible called by Bryant at the line of scrimmage. The Mids were lined up in the same unbalanced line that we saw against Rutgers. Jarod saw a numbers advantage on the short side of the field and changed the direction of the play. It was a good check by the highly-scrutinized signal-caller, and something that Coach Niumatalolo says should give him some confidence heading into this week.

Maybe it will. But what difference does “confidence” really make? The knock on Jarod was never his ability to read a defense at the line of scrimmage. It was his option reads after the snap. Confidence in what you’re doing is important, but does it help a quarterback identify and react to a mesh charge or a squat any better? It’s debatable. On one hand, you certainly don’t want to hesitate or second-guess what you’re doing. There’s no time to think; everything has to be a quick reaction to what you see. On the other hand, it’s just as easy to be confidently wrong. A fast reaction that gets yourself drilled in the backfield doesn’t do any good either. That seems to be what happens to Jarod. The most frustrating thing about all this is that we’ve seen Jarod make the right reads before. When Kaipo injured his knee in last year’s Ball State game, Jarod played the entire second half. At first, Paul Johnson called a lot of plays that were predetermined carries, especially the toss sweep. But as the half progressed, Coach Johnson starting mixing more of the triple option in. And Jarod did fine. Hell, by leading Navy on a comeback and putting the team in position to win the game at the end, you could even say it was better than just “fine.” So what happened? Why was Jarod able to run the triple against Ball State last year, but not since? Part of it is that Ball State didn’t exactly do anything to make things hard for Jarod; they gave him the same read almost every time. But perhaps another part of the problem comes from confidence that was lost somewhere along the way. Or maybe I’m just reaching. As I type this, I keep telling myself that talking so much about something as generic as “confidence” sounds trite. Then again, a little confidence has worked wonders for the defense the last couple of weeks. Do I let myself feel as optimistic about the offense?

Maybe. With Jarod Bryant at quarterback, the triple option hasn’t been available. That’s the one play that everything else in the offense feeds off of. The coaches say that they call plays differently because Jarod’s a better inside runner, but that’s because they don’t want to throw the poor guy under the bus. Think about it– they didn’t move him to slotback because of his ability to run between the tackles. I’m sure the coaches would love to see Jarod get to the edge, but he just hasn’t been able to read his way there. So the question is how effective Jarod will be, and whether the coaches will be forced to put him back into a protective playcalling bubble. If he can put it together, he will have a lot going for him. First and foremost is the re-emergence of Eric Kettani the last two weeks. Wake Forest paid a lot of attention to Shun White; so much so that Eric had some gaping holes to run through. With 300 yards in his last two games, Eric has shown that he is healthy enough that defenses need to respect the middle of the field. That helps to open things back up for Shun. Bobby Doyle’s big run last week is good news, too. Coach Jasper should be a bit more confident that his other slots should be able to make a play. At the very least, it’s one more thing to make a defense hesitate from keying too much on Shun.

Something else to to watch during the game is the matchup of the Navy offensive line with the front seven of Air Force. When Ken Niumatalolo was asked before the season why he moved Ricky Moore to center, the first thing out of his mouth was, “Air Force.” Air Force runs a base 3-4 defense. Against Navy, they like to move the two outside linebackers to the line of scrimmage to present a 5-man front. The odd front means that the nose guard is usually lined up directly on top of the center. Ricky Moore is bigger than other recent Navy centers, and the idea is that a bigger center will help open up more room for the fullback by moving that nose guard. If it works, that’s even better news for Kettani.

For Air Force, it’s the second straight year where they’ve started out 3-1 when logic would have convinced you before the season that they’d be a lot worse. But just like the beginning of last year, their defense is carrying the team, and they do it by being extremely aggressive. Through four games, the Air Force defense has compiled 16 sacks while forcing 12 turnovers. Jake Paulson leads the charge with seven of those sacks, while linebacker Ken Lamendola averages nine tackles per game. But the dirty little secret about the Air Force team is that this year, their defense is so aggressive because they have to be. If they didn’t force so many turnovers, Air Force might never score. It’s true that Air Force is sixth in the nation in rushing with nearly 282 yards per game. But that includes the 433 yards racked up against the notorious Southern Utah juggernaut. Since then, they’ve only averaged 231 yards per game. Sure, you could say the same thing about Navy and Towson, but trust me– this is different. Even with the backup quarterback taking the majority of their snaps, Navy is 33rd in the country in total offense. Air Force is 85th. So far, the Air Force offense has twice been held to only 12 first downs and less than 300 total yards. Against Utah, they had only 53 yards rushing. 53! Quarterback Shea Smith averages one interception in every ten passes, and was 0-for-7 passing against Houston– a game where Air Force was outgained by 154 yards. Air Force likes to feature a runner in each game; there was at least one 100-yard runner in each of their nine wins last year. But in 2008, they don’t have anyone they can rely on. Before the season there was a lot of hoopla about cornerback Reggie Rembert playing both ways this year. Air Force fans will tell you that it’s because he’s just that damn good, but the reality is that such things wouldn’t even be considered if there was enough speed and talent on the offensive side of the ball to begin with. The Falcons could get a boost this week with the return of Ty Paffett, who was out after offseason back surgery. Paffett plays the hybrid WR/RB “Z-receiver” that Chad Hall played last year, but it’s unclear just how effective he can be in his first game back.

If Kaipo was healthy, this game wouldn’t even be close, especially now that Navy’s defense has been reborn. Navy should still win, but it’s a much different game with Jarod Bryant at the helm. The Air Force defense is going to come after him hard. The game will be won or lost on Jarod’s ability to handle it. Hopefully, Jarod understands that he shouldn’t feel any pressure to make a big play. There is nothing wrong with punting and letting your defense win a field-position battle. If he can do that– and hold onto the ball– then Navy should get enough big plays from their more talented skill-position players to come out on top.

KAIPO WATCH ’08: DAY FOUR

Coach Niumatalolo said at his press briefing yesterday that Kaipo still isn’t ready to run, and would be at best a gametime decision. He said that Jarod Bryant would be most likely to get the start no matter what, with Kaipo hopefully being good enough to play in a pinch.

KAIPO WATCH ’08, DAY THREE

Kaipo still didn’t practice yesterday, sticking to the stationary bike. Coach Niumat did say that he would be making the trip to Colorado Springs, though, because you never know. That kind of talk doesn’t make me very confident that he’s going to play, which is probably what we all figured from the beginning.

MONDAY POLL: BIG WINS

In retrospect, I probably worded this poll wrong. I should have made it “most important win” instead of “biggest win.” Oops. Navy’s had some big wins over the last few years. Some didn’t quite make the list: the 2002 Meadowlands Massacre, Vanderbilt in 2003 & 2004, Colorado State in the 2005 Poinsettia Bowl, East Carolina & Stanford in 2006, and Pittsburgh from last year, to name a few. In fact, I probably should have included at least one game against Army on the list, if only out of respect for the rivalry. But oh well. That’s what “other” is for, should you be inclined to vote that way.

Here’s the list of candidates for Navy’s biggest win of the last 5 years:

  • Wake Forest, 2008: The highest-ranked team that Navy’s defeated in this period.
  • Notre Dame, 2007: I assume this one doesn’t require explanation.
  • Air Force, 2003: The first ranked team that Navy beat in this period. Also, the game that broke Fisher DeBerry.
  • Rutgers, 2004: Kyle Eckel might still be running.
  • New Mexico, 2004: Not only a bowl win, but the tenth win of the season, which propelled Navy into the top 25.

Thoughts?

NAVY 24, WAKE FOREST 17

It’s two days after Navy took down #16 Wake Forest, and I’m not sure how I feel.

I should feel elated. If I sounded upbeat at the end of the game preview, I was. Before the game I was pretty confident about how the Mids matched up with Wake Forest. The offense played well against them last year when Kaipo was in the game, and most of Wake’s same players were returning. Defensively, Wake seemed to play into what Navy did best against Rutgers. The Deacs have not been able to run the ball very well at all this year, so it didn’t seem likely that they’d be able to sustain drives the way Rutgers did riding the back of Jourdan Brooks. That meant that Wake would have to rely more heavily on its short passing game, which Navy defended well against a Scarlet Knight team with a more talented group of wide receivers than the Demon Deacons. With Kaipo healthy enough to finish the game and a defense that was improving from week to week, it looked like the best was yet to come for Navy football.

(I can’t in good conscience pat myself on the back too much, though. When Kaipo went down in the second quarter and started clutching at his hamstring, I pretty much gave up. I actually texted a friend, saying, “No Kaipo, no hope.” Little did I know that Navy’s defense would be so dominating.)

But that brings me back to my mixed feelings. This was as big a win as Navy’s had since the program was resurrected in 2003. But at what cost? Beating a top 25 team is fantastic, but losing Kaipo makes me feel as if this was a Pyrrhic victory. It’s cruel… We get a taste of what this team is capable of when Kaipo is healthy and the defense is born again hard. But just like that, it’s taken away from us. Well, maybe; Coach Niumat described Kaipo as “questionable,” so he didn’t rule out a return this week. But even if Kaipo’s status is up in the air at the moment, it’s hard to imagine that he’ll be available to start on Saturday. Then again, my medical knowledge is even more questionable than my knowledge of football, so who knows. I’m sure I’m just setting myself up for heartbreak by holding out hope.

Anyway, I guess there will be more on that later this week. Right now, it’s time to laugh at people.

LOL at people who say this offense can’t work in the ACC. Not that we didn’t already know. But seriously, it’s laughable how many supposed “experts” that once said the option was dead are now lining up to kiss Paul Johnson’s butt at Georgia Tech. Pretty sure I heard some ESPN talking head say the Yellow Jackets were his pick to get to the ACC championship game since “they’re the hardest team to prepare for.” O RLY? Hop on the bandwagon, everybody. You might as well start worrying about what BCS program is going to scoop up Ivin Jasper to run its offense, Navy fans. It’s going to happen sooner or later.

LOL at people who didn’t see improvement in the defense against Duke. Don’t get me wrong; the Ball State game was pretty bad. But even though the Mids lost to Duke the following week and gave up some big plays in the process, it was clear to anyone with an open mind that the defense was making strides. Now, they’re confident. Safeties are stepping in front of crossing routes and making plays. They’re swarming to the ball and jumping on fumbles that they couldn’t seem to recover last year. Missed tackles are WAY down. Quarterbacks are being pressured. It’s a revelation.

LOL at ACC referees. It’s time to dump the ACC. I know that every fan will probably say that its conference’s referees are terrible. I’m sure that’s partially true, too, as there are good crews and bad crews in any group of refs. Things like the overturned face mask and the no-call on the helmet-to-helmet would probably happen with any conference. But those aren’t the calls that really get to me. The two chop block calls against the Mids on Saturday were atrocious, and a result of ignorance of the rules. I am certain that chop blocks were something the referees were told to look out for before the game. And how often do we see flags for an illegal formation against the Mids thrown by a referee that was simply unprepared for Navy’s unconventional– but legal– formations? The problem with the ACC’s refs is that they are clearly unprepared for and uneducated about Navy’s offense. Now, don’t get me wrong; chances are that the same kinds of calls will be made no matter what conference Navy turns to for referees. The Naval Academy will always be at the bottom of the totem pole vs. actual conference members when it comes to referee assignments. But at some point, enough is enough. Whether it’s Big East, Big Ten, SEC, C-USA, MAC, whoever… It’s time to try someone else. You’d hope that with Georgia Tech running the same offense, things will change in the ACC. I’m not sure it’s worth the wait.

LOL at people saying that the team just isn’t as prepared without Paul Johnson. When Johnson left, I had my worries the same way everyone else did. We all know how hard it is to win at Navy, and how it isn’t something that can be done by just any coach. But holy cow, some people wanted to abandon ship after the Ball State game, saying things like “the team wasn’t ready!” and “the team is flat and uninspired!” and “PJ would’ve had them ready to play!” Sometimes I wonder what people like that actually see to make them say things like that. We still have a lot to discover about how Niumat will handle the long-term direction of the program, but as far as game-to-game preparation? The Mids are fine.

Anyway, back to the game.

There were two things that really stood out about Navy’s performance on Saturday. The first was Eric Kettani. Navy’s fullback averaged 9 yards per carry on the way to a career-best 175 yards rushing. It was clear early on that Ivin Jasper wanted to use the fullback to slow down Wake Forest’s sideline-to-sideline pursuit. The Deacs were focused on Shun White, who once again had double-digit carries (11), but managed only 20 rushing yards. To counter that, Jasper used misdirection with the fullback… In a way, he out-Wake Forested Wake Forest. You can see here how the middle linebacker starts following the flow of the play one way, then gets caught up in a block and is unable to make the tackle when Kettani cuts back in the lane opened for him by Jeff Battipaglia and Anthony Gaskins:

Like many of Eric’s carries on Saturday, this was a designed fullback give, not an option play. Coach Jasper clearly made the fullback a priority.

The other thing that obviously stood out about the game was the performance of Navy’s defense. There have been other great defensive performances in the last few years– last year against Army and the shutout against Tulsa to name a couple– but this was arguably the best of the bunch. After shutting out a top-20 team in the first half, the game was placed in the defense’s hands once Kaipo left the game. Things didn’t get any easier, as the fumble on the opening kickoff gave Wake Forest a short field and an easy drive for 7 points. In fact, the majority of the second half was played on Navy’s half of the field, as the offense could do absolutely nothing in the third quarter. But time and time again the defense responded with either a big third down stop or a turnover.

Navy held the Demon Deacons to a mere 43 rushing yards on 31 attempts. The key to that performance was the defensive line, particularly Nate Frazier. Nate was an absolute force on Saturday, drawing double-teams and a holding penalty. It was exactly what you need your nose tackle to do in a 3-4 defense. Jabaree Tuani made the most of his start, getting 6 tackles (two behind the line of scrimmage) and forcing a fumble. The defensive line also played a part in rattling Riley Skinner. Skinner completes a high percentage of his passes, mostly because Wake’s offense uses a lot of short passing. He’s a competent distributor of the ball in the confines of Steed Lobotzke’s offense. But he’s never been much of a downfield passer. Last year Skinner threw 13 interceptions, which is somewhat ridiculous considering the nature of the passing game in his offense. On Saturday, Navy’s defense took full advantage. They forced Skinner out of the pocket and dared him to throw downfield. The result was 4 interceptions. Sometimes it’s hard to tell whether turnovers should be blamed on the offense or be credited to the defense. Wake’s two fumbles might be the former, but I think Skinner’s 4 INTs were a result of excellent gameplanning by Buddy Green and Mids making plays.

Tomorrow is the second installment of the Navy football luncheon series, and maybe we’ll hear more about Kaipo’s status then. Pray for the best, because with a healthy Kaipo and a resurgent defense, there’s no telling what this Navy team is capable of. For now, I’ll enjoy this victory for one more day.